From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932537Ab1DLOqC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:46:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51012 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932435Ab1DLOp5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:45:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:45:04 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Rusty Russell , Carsten Otte , linux390@de.ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , lguest@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] virtio: 64 bit features Message-ID: <20110412144504.GB13850@redhat.com> References: <20110411165525.GA1395@redhat.com> <4DA45C08.4070304@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DA45C08.4070304@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:04:56PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 11.04.2011 18:55, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > Looks mostly good, but > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c > > +++ b/drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c > > @@ -82,13 +82,13 @@ static unsigned desc_size(const struct kvm_device_desc *desc) > > static u32 kvm_get_features(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > This should be u64. > Ugh. Sure. Will fix, thanks! > > { > > unsigned int i; > > - u32 features = 0; > > + u64 features = 0; > > struct kvm_device_desc *desc = to_kvmdev(vdev)->desc; > > u8 *in_features = kvm_vq_features(desc); > > > > - for (i = 0; i < min(desc->feature_len * 8, 32); i++) > > + for (i = 0; i < min(desc->feature_len * 8, 64); i++) > > if (in_features[i / 8] & (1 << (i % 8))) > > - features |= (1 << i); > > + features |= (1ull << i); > > return features; > > }