linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: shaohua.li@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	cl@linux.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch v2 3/4] percpu_counter: fix code for 32bit systems
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:04:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110413190411.GC3987@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110413080517.735973727@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:57:18PM +0800, shaohua.li@intel.com wrote:
>  static inline s64 percpu_counter_read(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
>  {
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> +	s64 count;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
> +	count = fbc->count;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
> +	return count;
> +#else
>  	return fbc->count;
> +#endif

I don't think this is safe.  The possible deadlock scenario was
percpu_counter_read() being called from irq context and adding irq
locking to percpu_counter_read() doesn't change that in any way.  You
should be changing locking in other places.  Given that the next patch
would make this dancing with locks all pointless, my suggestion is to
drop this patch and proceed with atomic64_t conversion directly and
note that the conversion also removes possible 32bit deviation on
32bit archs.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-13  7:57 [patch v2 0/4] percpu_counter: cleanup and fix shaohua.li
2011-04-13  7:57 ` [patch v2 1/4] percpu_counter: change return value and add comments shaohua.li
2011-04-13 19:05   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13  7:57 ` [patch v2 2/4] percpu_counter: delete dead code shaohua.li
2011-04-13 18:59   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18  0:12   ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-13  7:57 ` [patch v2 3/4] percpu_counter: fix code for 32bit systems shaohua.li
2011-04-13 19:04   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-13  7:57 ` [patch v2 4/4] percpu_counter: use atomic64 for counter shaohua.li
2011-04-13 19:07   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13 14:08 ` [patch v2 0/4] percpu_counter: cleanup and fix Christoph Lameter
2011-04-14  1:04   ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110413190411.GC3987@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).