From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.39-rc3
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:59:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110414085925.GD18463@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA6242D.90408@zytor.com>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:31:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 03:22 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:01:10PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> On 04/13/2011 02:50 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:48:48PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>>> - addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, 1ULL<<32, aper_size, 512ULL<<20);
> >>>> + addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, 1ULL<<32, aper_size, 512ULL<<21);
> >>>
> >>> Btw, while looking at this code I wondered why the 512M goal is enforced
> >>> by the alignment. Start could be set to 512M instead and the alignment
> >>> can be aper_size as it should. Any reason for such a big alignment?
> >>>
> >>> Joerg
> >>>
> >>> P.S.: The box is still in the office, I will try this debug-patch
> >>> tomorrow.
> >>
> >> The only reason that I can think of is that the aperture itself can be
> >> huge, and perhaps 512 MiB is the biggest such known.
> >
> > Well, that would work as well by just using aper_size as alignment, the
> > aperture needs to be aligned on its size anyway. This code only runs
> > when Linux allocates the aperture itself and if I am mistaken is uses
> > always 64MB when doing this.
>
> Yes, I would agree with that. The sane thing would be to set the base
> to whatever address needs to be guarded against (WHICH SHOULD BE
> MOTIVATED), and use aper_size as alignment, *unless* we are only using
> the initial portion of a much larger hardware structure that needs
> natural alignment (which isn't clear to me, I do know we sometimes use
> only a fraction of the GART, but that doesn't mean we need to
> naturally-align the entire thing, nor that 512 MiB is sufficient to do so.)
Whats allocated here is the address-space for the aperture. The code
actually allocates the memory but all it needs is the physical address
range. This range is later programmed into hardware as the GART aperture
(the area the GART remaps).
The Linux code can split the aperture if necessary for DMA-API usage and
AGP usage. In that case both users get a half of the aperture and manage
them itself.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 0:40 Linux 2.6.39-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2011-04-12 9:02 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-12 14:15 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-12 18:44 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 1:27 ` David Rientjes
2011-04-13 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-13 17:21 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 18:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-13 19:26 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 18:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-13 19:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 19:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-13 19:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 20:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-13 20:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 21:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-13 23:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-14 0:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-14 2:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-14 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-14 2:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-14 4:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-14 9:36 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-14 8:09 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-15 13:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-15 13:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-15 14:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-15 16:11 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-15 15:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-15 16:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-16 16:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-16 18:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-17 14:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-18 1:12 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-18 15:23 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-18 15:29 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-18 15:33 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-18 15:59 ` Jerome Glisse
2011-04-18 16:35 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-15 14:04 ` Andreas Herrmann
2011-04-15 14:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-15 14:16 ` Alexandre Demers
2011-04-15 14:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-15 18:59 ` Alexandre Demers
2011-04-15 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-15 19:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-15 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-16 12:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-16 12:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-16 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-16 0:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, amd: Disable GartTlbWlkErr when BIOS forgets it tip-bot for Joerg Roedel
2011-05-06 21:17 ` Linux 2.6.39-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 21:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 21:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-13 22:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-13 22:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-13 22:22 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-13 22:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-14 8:59 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-04-13 19:48 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-14 1:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-14 2:07 ` Dave Airlie
2011-04-14 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-14 8:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-14 9:07 ` Dave Airlie
2011-04-14 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-14 14:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-14 14:28 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-14 21:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-14 21:34 ` Alex Deucher
2011-04-15 6:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-15 14:49 ` Andreas Herrmann
2011-04-15 8:26 ` Michel Dänzer
2011-04-15 8:55 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-12 19:09 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-12 19:21 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-12 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-12 20:13 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-14 8:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-04-18 22:57 ` Kay Sievers
2011-04-18 23:02 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-18 23:14 ` Kay Sievers
2011-04-19 11:42 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-19 8:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-04-19 8:37 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-19 9:55 ` Kay Sievers
2011-04-12 20:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-12 20:27 ` Karel Zak
2011-04-12 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-14 20:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-14 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-15 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-20 20:12 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-13 4:32 George Spelvin
2011-04-13 14:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-14 18:28 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110414085925.GD18463@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).