linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
@ 2011-04-14 10:33 Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-04-14 10:47 ` Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2011-04-14 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rusty

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 371 bytes --]

1)I cannot understand why the WEAK entries are required after the
bad_subarch label :/ Any hints?
2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?

Thanks! :)

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@ece.ntua.gr>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
  2011-04-14 10:33 Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S) Stratos Psomadakis
@ 2011-04-14 10:47 ` Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2011-04-14 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

On 04/14/2011 01:33 PM, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> 1)I cannot understand why the WEAK entries are required after the
> bad_subarch label :/ Any hints
ok, the first question is just stupid, sorry for that one... :x

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@ece.ntua.gr>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
  2011-04-14 10:33 Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S) Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-04-14 10:47 ` Stratos Psomadakis
@ 2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
  2011-04-15 14:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2011-04-14 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stratos Psomadakis, linux-kernel

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:51 +0300, Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@ece.ntua.gr> wrote:
> 2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
> parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
> xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?

Yep, Xen never actually used it.

Cheers,
Rusty.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
  2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
@ 2011-04-15 14:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  2011-04-15 14:14     ` Stratos Psomadakis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2011-04-15 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Stratos Psomadakis, linux-kernel

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:40:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:51 +0300, Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@ece.ntua.gr> wrote:
> > 2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
> > parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
> > xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?
> 
> Yep, Xen never actually used it.

Does lguest use it? It looked like a neat idea - what happened?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
  2011-04-15 14:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2011-04-15 14:14     ` Stratos Psomadakis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2011-04-15 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: linux-kernel

On 04/15/2011 05:08 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:40:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:51 +0300, Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@ece.ntua.gr> wrote:
>>> 2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
>>> parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
>>> xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?
>> Yep, Xen never actually used it.
> Does lguest use it? It looked like a neat idea - what happened?
yeap, afaik, lguest uses the subarch field to jump to its own 'entry
point'...

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@ece.ntua.gr>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-15 14:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-14 10:33 Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S) Stratos Psomadakis
2011-04-14 10:47 ` Stratos Psomadakis
2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
2011-04-15 14:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-15 14:14     ` Stratos Psomadakis

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).