linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
@ 2011-04-14 10:33 Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-04-14 10:47 ` Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2011-04-14 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rusty

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 371 bytes --]

1)I cannot understand why the WEAK entries are required after the
bad_subarch label :/ Any hints?
2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?

Thanks! :)

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@ece.ntua.gr>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-15 14:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-14 10:33 Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S) Stratos Psomadakis
2011-04-14 10:47 ` Stratos Psomadakis
2011-04-14 12:10 ` Rusty Russell
2011-04-15 14:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-15 14:14     ` Stratos Psomadakis

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).