From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753131Ab1DSUIc (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:08:32 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:47349 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752483Ab1DSUIT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:08:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:07:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , Paul McKenney , Yanmin Zhang , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/20] mm: Convert i_mmap_lock to a mutex Message-Id: <20110419130725.38cb638b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20110401121726.037173835@chello.nl> References: <20110401121258.211963744@chello.nl> <20110401121726.037173835@chello.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:13:13 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Straight fwd conversion of i_mmap_lock to a mutex What effect does this have on kernel performance? Workloads which take the lock at high frequency from multiple threads should be tested.