From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:34:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110420143435.GB22436@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110420123330.GB3519@amit-x200.redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 06:03:30PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 28 Mar 2011 [11:52:05], Milton Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 about 14:17:14 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Thu) 24 Mar 2011 [08:58:04], Milton Miller wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:29:58 -0000, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > > hvc_open() can be called without having any backing device. This
> > > > > results in a call to hvc_kick() which calls wake_up_process on a NULL
> > > > > pointer.
> > > >
> > > > How is hvc_open called without a hvc_driver registered to the tty layer?
> > >
> > > This gets reproduced in a couple of scenarios, I'm trying to get more
> > > information.
>
> OK - I finally could reproduce myself, albiet it's a panic in
> hvc_open, not the one mentioned earlier.
>
> hvc_console is built into the kernel and virtio_console is a module.
> This sequence triggers a panic:
>
> - modprobe virtio_console
> - agetty /dev/hvc0 9600 vt100
> - rmmod virtio_console
> - modprobe virtio_console
> - agetty /dev/hvc0 9600 vt100
>
> A patch that I had sent previously, to hvc_remove() a port when the
> associated virtio_console port gets unplugged, fixes this panic.
>
> Stricter checking in hvc_open(), as you mentioned, will solve the
> other one as well.
Care to either create this patch, or resend your original one, if you
want it applied?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-20 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 7:29 [PATCH] hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised Amit Shah
2011-03-24 14:58 ` Milton Miller
2011-03-25 8:47 ` Amit Shah
2011-03-28 17:52 ` Milton Miller
2011-04-20 12:33 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-20 14:34 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-04-20 17:06 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-27 5:01 ` Rusty Russell
2011-04-27 6:31 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-28 0:09 ` Greg KH
2011-04-28 4:00 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110420143435.GB22436@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox