From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:47:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110421014716.GA12191@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110421010132.GE1814@dastard>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:01:32AM +0800, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:38:22PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > make. Please test against a vanilla kernel if that is what you are
> > > aiming these patches for. If you aren't aiming for a vanilla kernel,
> > > please say so in the patch series header...
> >
> > Here are the test results for vanilla kernel. It's again shows better
> > numbers for dd, tar and overall run time.
> >
> > 2.6.39-rc3 2.6.39-rc3-dyn-expire+
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > all elapsed 256.043 252.367
> > stddev 24.381 12.530
> >
> > tar elapsed 30.097 28.808
> > dd elapsed 13.214 11.782
>
> The big reduction in run-to-run variance is very convincing - moreso
> than the reduction in runtime - That's kind of what I had hoped
> would occur once I understood the implications of the change. Thanks
> for running the test to close the loop. :)
And you can see how the user perceivable variations in elapsed time
are reduced by the patchsets:
vanilla
user system %cpu elapsed
stddev 0.000 0.037 0.539 0.805 dd, xfs
stddev 0.117 0.102 5.974 3.498 tar, xfs
moving-target
stddev 0.000 0.102 1.025 0.803 dd, xfs
stddev 0.131 0.136 4.415 2.136 tar, xfs
IO-less + moving-target
stddev 0.000 0.022 0.000 0.283 dd, xfs
stddev 0.000 0.031 0.000 0.151 dd, ext4
stddev 0.111 0.218 2.040 0.532 tar, xfs
stddev 0.129 0.119 1.020 0.215 tar, ext4
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 3:00 [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 3:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] writeback: pass writeback_control down to move_expired_inodes() Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 3:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 7:02 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 7:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 9:31 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 3:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 7:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 9:57 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 12:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 13:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 1:21 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-20 2:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 2:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 3:01 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 3:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 4:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 6:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 16:04 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-22 2:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-22 21:12 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-26 5:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26 14:30 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20 7:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 1:47 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-04-19 3:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 9:47 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 3:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 10:20 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 11:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 21:10 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20 7:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 15:22 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21 3:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 4:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 6:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 16:41 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-22 2:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-22 21:23 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21 7:09 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 7:52 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-19 3:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFS: return -EAGAIN when skipped commit in nfs_commit_unstable_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 3:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-04-19 3:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-19 6:38 ` [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 8:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 5:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 6:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 10:15 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110421014716.GA12191@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).