From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] PM / Wakeup: Fix initialization of wakeup-related device sysfs files
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:57:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104212357.43052.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
It turns out that some PCI devices are only found to be
wakeup-capable during registration, in which case, when
device_set_wakeup_capable() is called, device_is_registered() already
returns 'true' for the given device, but dpm_sysfs_add() hasn't been
called for it yet. This leads to situations in which the device's
power.can_wakeup flag is not set as requested because of failing
wakeup_sysfs_add() and its wakeup-related sysfs files are not
created, although they should be present. This is a post-2.6.38
regression introduced by commit cb8f51bdadb7969139c2e39c2defd4cde98c1
(PM: Do not create wakeup sysfs files for devices that cannot wake
up).
To work around this problem initialize the device's power.entry
field to an empty list head and make device_set_wakeup_capable()
check if it is still empty before attempting to add the devices
wakeup-related sysfs files with wakeup_sysfs_add(). Namely, if
power.entry is still empty at this point, device_pm_add() hasn't been
called yet for the device and its wakeup-related files will be
created later, so device_set_wakeup_capable() doesn't have to create
them.
Reported-by: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 1 +
drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ void device_pm_init(struct device *dev)
dev->power.wakeup = NULL;
spin_lock_init(&dev->power.lock);
pm_runtime_init(dev);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->power.entry);
}
/**
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct de
if (!!dev->power.can_wakeup == !!capable)
return;
- if (device_is_registered(dev)) {
+ if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) {
if (capable) {
if (wakeup_sysfs_add(dev))
return;
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 21:57 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-04-22 7:57 ` [PATCH] PM / Wakeup: Fix initialization of wakeup-related device sysfs files Tino Keitel
2011-04-25 19:58 ` Tino Keitel
2011-04-25 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-25 20:33 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201104212357.43052.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tino.keitel@tikei.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox