linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:50:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110422005046.GQ2235@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTineNYTXffcNT59STsk5nkLhi=o-kA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1826 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:47:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:49:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Sedat Dilek
> >> <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:

[ . . . ]

> >> Here the results from the 2nd-run (PREEMPT_RCU enabled).
> >
> > OK, and the grace periods clearly stopped advancing early on.
> >
> > Beyond that point, the per-CPU kthread is blocked, but RCU has some
> > work for it to do.  So someone has called invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(),
> > but rcu_cpu_kthread() is still blocked.  I don't see a bug right
> > off-hand, but it is early in the morning for me, so I might easily
> > be missing something.
> >
> > Hmmm...
> >
> > The synchronization between these two assumes that the per-CPU
> > kthread is always bound to the respective CPU, so if was somehow
> > being migrated off, that might explain these results.
> >
> > I will add some more diagnostics, test them locally, then push
> > out an update.  Seem reasonable?
> >
> > And thank you again for the testing!!!
> 
> Ping me when you have new stuff for testing.
> Tomorrow (friday), here is public holiday and monday, too.
> So a looong weekend.

;-)

OK, I have a new sedat.2011.04.21a branch in the -rcu git tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git

This is against 2.6.39-rc3, as before.  (Yes, I do need to rebase to
2.6.39-rc4, but didn't want to change any more than I had to.)

I also have an updated script, which is attached.  The output is similar
to the earlier one, and it operated is pretty much the same way.

Have a great weekend, and I look forward to seeing what shows up on
this round.  I confess to still being quite puzzled!

							Thanx, Paul

[-- Attachment #2: collectdebugfs.sh --]
[-- Type: application/x-sh, Size: 1679 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-22  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14  8:59 linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?) Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14  9:16 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 10:19   ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 22:19     ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 22:44       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-21  5:08         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-21  9:07           ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-21 10:24             ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-21 12:49               ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-21 14:28                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-21 14:47                   ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-22  0:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-04-22  9:40                       ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-22 15:02                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-22 17:36                           ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-23 21:05                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-23 21:16                               ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-23 23:04                                 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-23 23:08                                   ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-24  6:27                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-24  9:36                                       ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-24 16:43                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26  5:06                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 11:45                                             ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-26 12:42                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 12:50                                                 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-26 15:42                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 10:06                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-26 11:31                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 19:44                                               ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110422005046.GQ2235@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).