linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@mvista.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:59:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110423175922.GB484@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110423175901.GA484@redhat.com>

No functional changes, cleanup compat_sys_rt_sigtimedwait() and
sys_rt_sigtimedwait().

Calculate the timeout before we take ->siglock, this simplifies and
lessens the code. Use timespec_valid() to check the timespec.

I don't understand why we are adding (ts.tv_sec || ts.tv_nsec) to
timespec_to_jiffies(&ts). Perhaps to ensure we will sleep at least
one jiffy if ts != 0? But in this case we should only check tv_nsec,
I don't think timespec_to_jiffies() can return zero if tv_sec != 0.
In fact I suspect timespec_to_jiffies() can only return zero if
tv_sec == tv_nsec == 0 because we add "TICK_NSEC - 1", but I am not
sure I understand correctly this math.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---

 kernel/signal.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 kernel/compat.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

--- sigprocmask/kernel/signal.c~1_sigtimedwait_to	2011-04-22 15:48:33.000000000 +0200
+++ sigprocmask/kernel/signal.c	2011-04-22 19:05:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rt_sigtimedwait, const s
 	sigset_t these;
 	struct timespec ts;
 	siginfo_t info;
-	long timeout = 0;
+	long timeout;
 
 	/* XXX: Don't preclude handling different sized sigset_t's.  */
 	if (sigsetsize != sizeof(sigset_t))
@@ -2343,41 +2343,35 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rt_sigtimedwait, const s
 	sigdelsetmask(&these, sigmask(SIGKILL)|sigmask(SIGSTOP));
 	signotset(&these);
 
+	timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
 	if (uts) {
 		if (copy_from_user(&ts, uts, sizeof(ts)))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		if (ts.tv_nsec >= 1000000000L || ts.tv_nsec < 0
-		    || ts.tv_sec < 0)
+		if (!timespec_valid(&ts))
 			return -EINVAL;
+		timeout = timespec_to_jiffies(&ts) + (ts.tv_sec || ts.tv_nsec);
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	sig = dequeue_signal(current, &these, &info);
-	if (!sig) {
-		timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
-		if (uts)
-			timeout = (timespec_to_jiffies(&ts)
-				   + (ts.tv_sec || ts.tv_nsec));
-
-		if (timeout) {
-			/*
-			 * None ready -- temporarily unblock those we're
-			 * interested while we are sleeping in so that we'll
-			 * be awakened when they arrive.
-			 */
-			current->real_blocked = current->blocked;
-			sigandsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &these);
-			recalc_sigpending();
-			spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	if (!sig && timeout) {
+		/*
+		 * None ready -- temporarily unblock those we're
+		 * interested while we are sleeping in so that we'll
+		 * be awakened when they arrive.
+		 */
+		current->real_blocked = current->blocked;
+		sigandsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &these);
+		recalc_sigpending();
+		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 
-			timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
+		timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
 
-			spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-			sig = dequeue_signal(current, &these, &info);
-			current->blocked = current->real_blocked;
-			siginitset(&current->real_blocked, 0);
-			recalc_sigpending();
-		}
+		spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+		sig = dequeue_signal(current, &these, &info);
+		current->blocked = current->real_blocked;
+		siginitset(&current->real_blocked, 0);
+		recalc_sigpending();
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 
--- sigprocmask/kernel/compat.c~1_sigtimedwait_to	2011-04-14 21:23:22.000000000 +0200
+++ sigprocmask/kernel/compat.c	2011-04-22 19:19:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ compat_sys_rt_sigtimedwait (compat_sigse
 	int sig;
 	struct timespec t;
 	siginfo_t info;
-	long ret, timeout = 0;
+	long ret, timeout;
 
 	if (sigsetsize != sizeof(sigset_t))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -904,36 +904,30 @@ compat_sys_rt_sigtimedwait (compat_sigse
 	sigdelsetmask(&s,sigmask(SIGKILL)|sigmask(SIGSTOP));
 	signotset(&s);
 
+	timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
 	if (uts) {
 		if (get_compat_timespec (&t, uts))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		if (t.tv_nsec >= 1000000000L || t.tv_nsec < 0
-				|| t.tv_sec < 0)
+		if (!timespec_valid(&t))
 			return -EINVAL;
+		timeout = timespec_to_jiffies(&t) + (t.tv_sec || t.tv_nsec);
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	sig = dequeue_signal(current, &s, &info);
-	if (!sig) {
-		timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
-		if (uts)
-			timeout = timespec_to_jiffies(&t)
-				+(t.tv_sec || t.tv_nsec);
-		if (timeout) {
-			current->real_blocked = current->blocked;
-			sigandsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &s);
-
-			recalc_sigpending();
-			spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	if (!sig && timeout) {
+		current->real_blocked = current->blocked;
+		sigandsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &s);
+		recalc_sigpending();
+		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 
-			timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
+		timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
 
-			spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-			sig = dequeue_signal(current, &s, &info);
-			current->blocked = current->real_blocked;
-			siginitset(&current->real_blocked, 0);
-			recalc_sigpending();
-		}
+		spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+		sig = dequeue_signal(current, &s, &info);
+		current->blocked = current->real_blocked;
+		siginitset(&current->real_blocked, 0);
+		recalc_sigpending();
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 
@@ -943,7 +937,7 @@ compat_sys_rt_sigtimedwait (compat_sigse
 			if (copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info))
 				ret = -EFAULT;
 		}
-	}else {
+	} else {
 		ret = timeout?-EINTR:-EAGAIN;
 	}
 	return ret;


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-23 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-18 13:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:04   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:49   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:22   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:52   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:20     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:19       ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:02         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:11           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 19:45             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-28 15:26               ` [PATCHSET] signals-review branch Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-30 12:51                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: optimize while_each_thread() loop Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:26   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:03   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of ->siglock Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:31   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:05   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:46   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:14   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86: signal: handle_signal() should use set_current_blocked() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 13:45   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:19   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:14   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:12     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:21   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 8/7] signal: cleanup sys_rt_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:30   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:20     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 18:47       ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:26   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 17:32   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 17:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-23 17:59       ` [PATCH 0/3] do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 17:59         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-04-25 11:37           ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:26             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:56                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 19:38                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 10:18           ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 17:59         ` [PATCH 2/3] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:39           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 11:49           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:33             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:25               ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:28           ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:00         ` [PATCH 3/3] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:52           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 16:01             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:27               ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:07                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:12                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:40                   ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 10:42           ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:48         ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sigtimedwait/sigprocmask need retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:48           ` [PATCH v2 1/6] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49           ` [PATCH v2 2/6] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:09             ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:24             ` Matt Fleming
2011-05-11 16:21             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-12 18:54               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 16:44               ` [PATCH] signal: trivial, fix the "timespec declared inside parameter list" warning Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 18:09                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-16 12:57                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 12:57                     ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 17:39                       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-18 23:37                       ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-19 18:19                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-19 19:21                           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-26 19:49           ` [PATCH v2 3/6] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49           ` [PATCH v2 4/6] signal: cleanup sys_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:12             ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:31             ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:50           ` [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 21:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 12:57               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 13:04                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 20:07               ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-01 20:08                 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:50           ` [PATCH v2 6/6] signal: rename signandsets() to sigandnsets() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:11             ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:43             ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110423175922.GB484@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=nyoushchenko@mvista.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).