From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, konrad@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH v6] xen pci backend driver.
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:05:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110426030540.GA29384@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110425115850.48b7d254@jbarnes-desktop>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:58:50AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:07:19 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > The following patch implements the Xen pci backend for upstream Linux.
> > This is the host side counterpart to the frontend driver in
> > drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c. The PV protocol is also implemented by
> > frontend drivers in other OSes too, such as the BSDs.
> >
> > This driver has a long history as an out of tree driver but I am
> > submitting it here as a single monolithic patch to aid review. Once it
> > has been reviewed and is considered suitable for merging can we perhaps
> > consider merging the equivalent git branch which maintains much of
> > history?
>
> It looks pretty clean at first glance (though 128k worth of patch isn't
> an ideal way to split it).
4K lines of code is a lot :-) Thank you for taking a look at it.
>
> But maybe the back end belongs in arch/x86/xen as it's really a arch
> specific PCI implementation at heart? I don't want to be a bottleneck
> for any Xen specific PCI patches in the future, and other arches have a
> similar split (though not always with an ideal core vs arch split).
I was thinking about having it in the drivers/* as ideally it should
be a module. You really don't need to have it built in. I am not that
worried about you being a bottleneck - I am OK asking two weeks before
a merge for you to pull from my tree if I have some patches for it?
Or is there some other bottleneck that I am not aware of?
>
> Figuring out some way to preserve the git history is probably a good
> idea, assuming it's not too much of a mess. If it is, a more
> reasonable split and history using rebase could probably be contrived
> before merging it.
<nods>
>
> --
> Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 21:07 [PATCH v6] xen pci backend driver Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-20 21:07 ` [PATCH] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-25 18:58 ` [PATCH v6] " Jesse Barnes
2011-04-26 3:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-05-27 15:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-31 17:00 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-07-15 15:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110426030540.GA29384@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).