From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755343Ab1DZNAW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:00:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30451 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755147Ab1DZNAV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:00:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:00:04 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Minchan Kim Cc: Mel Gorman , akpm@linux-foundation.org, raz ben yehuda , riel@redhat.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Check if PTE is already allocated during page fault Message-ID: <20110426130004.GA27267@random.random> References: <20110415101248.GB22688@suse.de> <20110421110841.GA612@suse.de> <20110421142636.GA1835@barrios-desktop> <20110421160057.GA28712@suse.de> <20110421161402.GS5611@random.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:54:24AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Before doing that, let's clear the point. You mentioned it shouldn't > be a common occurrence but you are suggesting we should do for code > consistency POV. Am I right? Yes, for code consistency and cleanup. Thanks, Andrea