From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes,x86: disable irq durinr optimized callback
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:19:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110426141903.GC1896@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110426134625.GA21840@home.goodmis.org>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:46:25AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > attached patch is disabling irqs during optimized callback,
> > so we dont miss any in-irq kprobes as missed.
> >
> > Also I think there's small window where current_kprobe variable
> > could be touched in non-safe way, but I was not able to hit
> > any issue.
> >
> > I'm not sure wether this is a bug or if it was intentional to have
> > irqs enabled during the pre_handler callback.
>
> That's not very convincing. Did you see if we actually did miss events.
> If that's the case then it is a bug. The conversion to optimizing should
> not cause events to be missed.
yep, running following:
# cd /debug/tracing/
# echo "p mutex_unlock" >> kprobe_events
# echo "p _raw_spin_lock" >> kprobe_events
# echo "p smp_apic_timer_interrupt" >> ./kprobe_events
# echo 1 > events/enable
makes the optimized kprobes to be missed. They are not missed in
same testcase for non-optimized kprobes. I should have mentioned
that, sry ;)
>
>
> >
> > wbr,
> > jirka
> >
> > ---
> > Disabling irqs during optimized callback, so we dont miss
> > any in-irq kprobes as missed.
> >
> > Interrupts are also disabled during non-optimized kprobes callbacks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +++
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index c969fd9..917cb31 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -1183,11 +1183,13 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
> > struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> > + unsigned long flags;
> >
> > /* This is possible if op is under delayed unoptimizing */
> > if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
> > return;
> >
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
>
> No reason to disable preemption if you disabled interrupts.
ops, missed that.. attaching new patch
thanks,
jirka
---
Disabling irqs during optimized callback, so we dont miss
any in-irq kprobes as missed.
running following:
# cd /debug/tracing/
# echo "p mutex_unlock" >> kprobe_events
# echo "p _raw_spin_lock" >> kprobe_events
# echo "p smp_apic_timer_interrupt" >> ./kprobe_events
# echo 1 > events/enable
makes the optimized kprobes to be missed. None is missed
if the kprobe optimatization is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
index c969fd9..f1a6244 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1183,12 +1183,13 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+ unsigned long flags;
/* This is possible if op is under delayed unoptimizing */
if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
return;
- preempt_disable();
+ local_irq_save(flags);
if (kprobe_running()) {
kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
} else {
@@ -1207,7 +1208,7 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
opt_pre_handler(&op->kp, regs);
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
}
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static int __kprobes copy_optimized_instructions(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-26 13:01 [PATCH] kprobes,x86: disable irq durinr optimized callback Jiri Olsa
2011-04-26 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-26 14:19 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2011-04-27 0:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-05-09 11:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-05-10 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-10 11:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-05-10 11:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-11 11:06 ` [PATCH, v2] kprobes, x86: Disable irq during " Jiri Olsa
2011-05-11 13:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] kprobes, x86: Disable irqs " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110426141903.GC1896@jolsa.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox