From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@mvista.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending()
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:57:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427125710.GA21281@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinp8FGQu2D1NVVc7xfEsqopook7Hg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/26, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > + sigemptyset(&new_full_set);
> > + if (how == SIG_SETMASK)
> > + new_full_set = current->blocked;
> > + new_full_set.sig[0] = new_set;
>
> Ugh. This is just ugly.
Agreed.
> Could we not instead turn the whole thing into a "clear these bits"
> and "set these bits", and get rid of the "how" entirely for the helper
> function?
>
> IOW, we'd have
>
> switch (how) {
> case SIG_BLOCK:
> clear_bits = 0;
> set_bits = new_set;
> break;
> case SIG_UNBLOCK:
> clear_bits = new_set;
> set_bits = 0;
> break
> case SIG_SET:
> clear_bits = low_bits;
> set_bits = new_set;
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> and notice how you now can do that helper function *WITHOUT* any
> conditionals, and just make it do
>
> sigprocmask(&clear, &set, NULL);
>
> which handles all cases correctly (just "andn clear" + "or set") with
> no if's or switch'es.
>
> This is why I _detest_ that idiotic "sigprocmask()" interface.
Agreed, but...
Yes, sigprocmask(how) is ugly, but there are sys_rt_sigprocmask() and
sys_sigprocmask() which have to handle these SIG_* operations anyway.
So, I think we should do:
1. Almost all callers of sigprocmask() use SIG_SETMASK, we can
simply change them to use set_current_blocked().
2. Add the new helper (probably like you suggested) and convert
other 9 callers.
3. Unexport sigprocmask() and remove the last "*oldset" argument,
it should be only used by sys_*sigprocmask() syscalls.
But firstly I'd like to finish this "don't change ->blocked directly"
conversion. And this patch changes sys_sigprocmask() so that it looks
similar to sys_rt_sigprocmask().
What do you think?
If you can't accept sys_sigprocmask()->sigprocmask(), will you agree
with
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sigprocmask, int, how, old_sigset_t __user *, nset,
old_sigset_t __user *, oset)
{
old_sigset_t old_set, new_set;
sigset_t new_blocked;
old_set = current->blocked.sig[0];
if (nset) {
if (copy_from_user(&new_set, nset, sizeof(*nset)))
return -EFAULT;
new_set &= ~(sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
new_blocked = current->blocked;
switch (how) {
case SIG_BLOCK:
sigaddsetmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
break;
case SIG_UNBLOCK:
sigdelsetmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
break;
case SIG_SETMASK:
new_blocked.sig[0] = new_set;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
set_current_blocked(&new_blocked);
}
if (oset) {
if (copy_to_user(oset, &old_set, sizeof(*oset)))
return -EFAULT;
}
return 0;
}
?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 13:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:04 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:22 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-28 15:26 ` [PATCHSET] signals-review branch Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-30 12:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: optimize while_each_thread() loop Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:26 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of ->siglock Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:31 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:46 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:14 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86: signal: handle_signal() should use set_current_blocked() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 13:45 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:14 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 8/7] signal: cleanup sys_rt_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:30 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 18:47 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 17:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 10:18 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:39 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 11:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:28 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 16:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:40 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 10:42 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sigtimedwait/sigprocmask need retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:24 ` Matt Fleming
2011-05-11 16:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-12 18:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 16:44 ` [PATCH] signal: trivial, fix the "timespec declared inside parameter list" warning Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 18:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-16 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 12:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 17:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-18 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-19 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-19 19:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] signal: cleanup sys_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:31 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-04-27 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 20:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-01 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] signal: rename signandsets() to sigandnsets() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:43 ` Matt Fleming
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-27 1:35 [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() George Spelvin
2011-04-27 2:00 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110427125710.GA21281@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=nyoushchenko@mvista.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).