From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: optimize rcutiny
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:54:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429075432.GJ2191@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303968225.2587.602.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> rcu_sched_qs() currently calls local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore() up
> to three times.
>
> Remove irq masking from rcu_qsctr_help() / invoke_rcu_kthread()
> and do it once in rcu_sched_qs() / rcu_bh_qs()
>
> This generates smaller code as well.
>
> # size kernel/rcutiny.old.o kernel/rcutiny.new.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 2314 156 24 2494 9be kernel/rcutiny.old.o
> 2250 156 24 2430 97e kernel/rcutiny.new.o
>
> Fix an outdated comment for rcu_qsctr_help()
> Move invoke_rcu_kthread() definition before its use.
Looks very nice! In theory, this does lengthen the time during which
interrupts are disabled, but in practice I believe that that this would
not be measurable. Adding Thomas on CC in case I am mistaken about
the effect of longer irq-disable regions.
In the meantime, I have queued this, and either way, thank you, Eric!
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutiny.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny.c b/kernel/rcutiny.c
> index 0c343b9..29eb349 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
> static struct task_struct *rcu_kthread_task;
> static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rcu_kthread_wq);
> static unsigned long have_rcu_kthread_work;
> -static void invoke_rcu_kthread(void);
>
> /* Forward declarations for rcutiny_plugin.h. */
> struct rcu_ctrlblk;
> @@ -79,36 +78,45 @@ void rcu_exit_nohz(void)
> #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
>
> /*
> - * Helper function for rcu_qsctr_inc() and rcu_bh_qsctr_inc().
> - * Also disable irqs to avoid confusion due to interrupt handlers
> + * Helper function for rcu_sched_qs() and rcu_bh_qs().
> + * Also irqs are disabled to avoid confusion due to interrupt handlers
> * invoking call_rcu().
> */
> static int rcu_qsctr_help(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> if (rcp->rcucblist != NULL &&
> rcp->donetail != rcp->curtail) {
> rcp->donetail = rcp->curtail;
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> return 1;
> }
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> + * Wake up rcu_kthread() to process callbacks now eligible for invocation
> + * or to boost readers.
> + */
> +static void invoke_rcu_kthread(void)
> +{
> + have_rcu_kthread_work = 1;
> + wake_up(&rcu_kthread_wq);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Record an rcu quiescent state. And an rcu_bh quiescent state while we
> * are at it, given that any rcu quiescent state is also an rcu_bh
> * quiescent state. Use "+" instead of "||" to defeat short circuiting.
> */
> void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> if (rcu_qsctr_help(&rcu_sched_ctrlblk) +
> rcu_qsctr_help(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk))
> invoke_rcu_kthread();
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -116,8 +124,12 @@ void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
> */
> void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> if (rcu_qsctr_help(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk))
> invoke_rcu_kthread();
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -208,20 +220,6 @@ static int rcu_kthread(void *arg)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Wake up rcu_kthread() to process callbacks now eligible for invocation
> - * or to boost readers.
> - */
> -static void invoke_rcu_kthread(void)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - have_rcu_kthread_work = 1;
> - wake_up(&rcu_kthread_wq);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> * Wait for a grace period to elapse. But it is illegal to invoke
> * synchronize_sched() from within an RCU read-side critical section.
> * Therefore, any legal call to synchronize_sched() is a quiescent
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 5:23 [PATCH] rcu: optimize rcutiny Eric Dumazet
2011-04-29 7:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-04-29 7:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110429075432.GJ2191@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox