[PATCH tip/core/rcu 43/86] net,rcu: convert call_rcu(ha_rcu_free) to kfree_rcu()

Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-01T13:36:53Z

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

The rcu callback ha_rcu_free() just calls a kfree(),
so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(ha_rcu_free).

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 12 ++----------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
index 7b39f3e..e2e6693 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
@@ -68,14 +68,6 @@ static int __hw_addr_add(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *list, unsigned char *addr,
return __hw_addr_add_ex(list, addr, addr_len, addr_type, false);
}

-static void ha_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
-{
- struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
-
- ha = container_of(head, struct netdev_hw_addr, rcu_head);
- kfree(ha);
-}
-
static int __hw_addr_del_ex(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *list,
unsigned char *addr, int addr_len,
unsigned char addr_type, bool global)
@@ -94,7 +86,7 @@ static int __hw_addr_del_ex(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *list,
if (--ha->refcount)
return 0;
list_del_rcu(&ha->list);
- call_rcu(&ha->rcu_head, ha_rcu_free);
+ kfree_rcu(ha, rcu_head);
list->count--;
return 0;
}
@@ -197,7 +189,7 @@ void __hw_addr_flush(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *list)

list_for_each_entry_safe(ha, tmp, &list->list, list) {
list_del_rcu(&ha->list);
- call_rcu(&ha->rcu_head, ha_rcu_free);
+ kfree_rcu(ha, rcu_head);
}
list->count = 0;
}
--
1.7.3.2