public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "L. Alberto Giménez" <agimenez@sysvalve.es>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dgiagio@gmail.com,
	dborca@yahoo.com, pmcenery@gmail.com, david.hill@ubisoft.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipheth.c: Enable IP header alignment
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502211245.GA18334@bart.evergreen.loc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502.124622.226785624.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:46:22PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Why did this break things?

Hi, I don't know. As upstream is unresponsive and is applying patches to his
private repo without submitting them to the list (which I can understand), I
decided to submit the particular fix so mainline users can get tethering working
again.

I received a forwarded email with the patch (I think that's because I submitted
the driver to mainline) asking for the mainline driver status and if it was
being maintained.

> 
> I'm not applying a fix when nobody can explain the reason why:
> 
> 1) Things broke in the first place
> 2) Forcing reservation of 2 bytes fixes things

Honestly, I can't answer either of those ones. I just submitted a patch that
*seemed* to fix the problem (I don't own an iPhone device since long time ago),
after explictly requesting upstream to submit by himself, and getting a
negative.


> Where is the built in assumption about "2" and why does it exist?  Why
> can't we fix this code not to have such assumptions in the first
> place?

Ditto.

At this point, I think that David, Diego or Daniel should step in if they want
to keep on with this discussion. I won't have problems if you want to take this
off-list.

Best regards,

-- 
L. Alberto Giménez
JabberID agimenez@jabber.sysvalve.es
GnuPG key ID 0x3BAABDE1

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-01 11:00 [PATCH] ipheth.c: Enable IP header alignment L. Alberto Giménez
2011-05-01 15:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-02 19:35   ` L. Alberto Giménez
2011-05-02 19:46     ` David Miller
2011-05-02 21:12       ` L. Alberto Giménez [this message]
2011-05-02 21:04     ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-03 16:57       ` L. Alberto Giménez
2011-05-03 17:18         ` David Hill
2011-05-03 17:33           ` Paul McEnery
2011-05-03 17:41             ` David Hill
2011-05-03 22:45               ` Paul McEnery
2011-05-03 17:49           ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipheth: Properly distinguish length and alignment in URBs and skbs Ben Hutchings
2011-05-08 22:46             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110502211245.GA18334@bart.evergreen.loc \
    --to=agimenez@sysvalve.es \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.hill@ubisoft.com \
    --cc=dborca@yahoo.com \
    --cc=dgiagio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmcenery@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox