Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: tps65911: Add new chip version

[Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>]

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:18:49AM -0500, Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote:

Mostly OK - a few small things.

> +	if (id == TPS65910_REG_VDD1 || id == TPS65910_REG_VDD2) {
> +		dcdc_mult = (selector / VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) + 1;
> +		if (dcdc_mult == 1) dcdc_mult--;
> +		vsel = (selector % VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) + 3;
> +	} else {
> +		vsel = selector;
> +	}

Things like this should be switch statements.

> -	volt = VDD1_2_MIN_VOLT + (selector % VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) * VDD1_2_OFFSET;
> +	if (id == TPS65911_REG_VDDCTRL)
> +		volt = VDDCTRL_MIN_VOLT + (selector * VDDCTRL_OFFSET);
> +	else
> +		mult = (selector / VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) + 1;
> +		volt = VDD1_2_MIN_VOLT +
> +				(selector % VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) * VDD1_2_OFFSET;

This doesn't tie in with the equivalent change in list_voltage() since
you're testing for a different regulator (but it looks OK from a quick
scan I *think*).

> +	if (tps65910_chip_id(tps65910) == TPS65910) {
> +		pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65910_get_ctrl_register;
> +		info = tps65910_regs;
> +	} else if (tps65910_chip_id(tps65910) == TPS65911) {
> +		pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65911_get_ctrl_register;
> +		info = tps65911_regs;
> +	} else {
> +		pr_err("Invalid tps chip version\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}

switch statement.