From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752778Ab1EDJrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 05:47:00 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:35847 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691Ab1EDJq7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 05:46:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 05:46:54 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes and trace events Message-ID: <20110504094654.GA31151@infradead.org> References: <20110504091707.910929441@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504091707.910929441@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:17:07PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Andrew, > > Here are one more collection of simple writeback patches. How does this relate to the other floating writeback patches? We really need a proper writeback tree to make any sense of the patch queues..