From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752972Ab1EDJ4l (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 05:56:41 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:16370 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752094Ab1EDJ4k (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 05:56:40 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,313,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="917818105" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:56:37 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , LKML , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes and trace events Message-ID: <20110504095637.GA2101@localhost> References: <20110504091707.910929441@intel.com> <20110504094654.GA31151@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504094654.GA31151@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:46:54PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:17:07PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > Here are one more collection of simple writeback patches. > > How does this relate to the other floating writeback patches? We > really need a proper writeback tree to make any sense of the patch > queues.. These patches are based on the writeback patches already in -mm. Sorry I should have mentioned it. Thanks, Fengguang