From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753094Ab1EDKGR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 06:06:17 -0400 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:38907 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751922Ab1EDKGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 06:06:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHMjwU15LBza/2dsb2JhbACmFnjEIQ6FeQSeAQ Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 20:06:09 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , LKML , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes and trace events Message-ID: <20110504100609.GE9114@dastard> References: <20110504091707.910929441@intel.com> <20110504094654.GA31151@infradead.org> <20110504095637.GA2101@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504095637.GA2101@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:56:37PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:46:54PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:17:07PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > Andrew, > > > > > > Here are one more collection of simple writeback patches. > > > > How does this relate to the other floating writeback patches? We > > really need a proper writeback tree to make any sense of the patch > > queues.. > > These patches are based on the writeback patches already in -mm. > Sorry I should have mentioned it. Does anyone actaully testing filesystems use the -mm tree? I'm pretty sure that no-one in the XFS world does, and I don't think that any ext4 or btrfs folk do, either.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com