From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753329Ab1EDLLi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 07:11:38 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:61494 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753155Ab1EDLLh (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 07:11:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,313,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="917846182" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:11:30 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Mel Gorman , Mel Gorman , Dave Chinner , Itaru Kitayama , Minchan Kim , Linux Memory Management List , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Message-ID: <20110504111130.GA5191@localhost> References: <20110420080336.441157866@intel.com> <20110420080917.890756812@intel.com> <20110504110500.GB4646@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504110500.GB4646@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:05:00PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Same here - this has nothing to do with actual page writeback and really > should stay internal to fs/fs-writeback.c OK, I'll check how to constrain writeback_control to the minimal scope. Thanks, Fengguang