From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Sattler <tsattler@gmx.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: iotop: khugepaged at 99.99% (2.6.38.X)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:55:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506175548.GE6330@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC3B629.7010409@gmx.de>
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:49:45AM +0200, Thomas Sattler wrote:
> > You can already run "grep threshold /proc/zoneinfo" on the system
> > where you reproduced the hang the last time (the one running 2.6.38.4)
> > the one with 1.5G of ram. They all should be well below 512 (so in
> > theory not causing troubles because of the per-cpu stats, and with so
> > few cpus it shouldn't have been such a longstanding problem anyway).
>
> 'grep threshold /proc/zoneinfo' returns nothing on this machine after
> a reboot and before a crash. Did I tell it's a single core machine?
Hmm single core machine doesn't seem to fit my theory of per-cpu stats
too well... I think it's not impossible but it should only be possible
on smp and maybe it's not reproducible and probably not what you're
dealing with.
The new make-it-worse-patch should help to reproduce though.
If you can "cat /proc/zoneinfo" _during_ the hang (and then run
sysrq+t again to see the status, no need of sysrq+l), it'll help to
try to track this down. I'll recheck your last sysrq+t once again to
see if I get other ideas.
A 'cat /proc/zoneinfo' after the hang resolves itself and the system
is mostly idle, will also be interesting to verify the nr_isolated_*
are all zero.
Thanks,
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 23:28 iotop: khugepaged at 99.99% (2.6.38.3) Thomas Sattler
2011-04-27 13:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-04 12:20 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-05-04 12:37 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-05-04 14:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-05 13:08 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-05-05 22:04 ` iotop: khugepaged at 99.99% (2.6.38.X) Thomas Sattler
2011-05-06 1:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-06 6:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-06 8:49 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-05-06 8:54 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-05-06 14:24 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-05-06 17:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-06 17:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-05-11 10:53 ` iotop: khugepaged at 99.99% (2.6.38.3) Ulrich Keller
2011-05-12 14:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16 9:27 ` Ulrich Keller
2011-05-16 12:29 ` Ulrich Keller
2011-05-23 18:05 ` Johannes Hirte
2011-05-25 16:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-25 20:44 ` Thomas Sattler
2011-06-01 19:37 ` Gilles Hamel
2011-06-13 10:28 ` Antonio Messina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110506175548.GE6330@random.random \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=tsattler@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox