* [PATCH] fs: avoid unecessary smp_wmb() in dup_fd()
@ 2011-05-07 6:30 Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2011-05-07 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro
Cc: Matthew Wilcox, linux-fsdevel, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel,
Paul E. McKenney, Changli Gao
While copying old_fds array to new_fds, we dont need
rcu_assign_pointer() and its smp_wmb(), since we are the only thread
populating new_fds at this point.
A bit later, rcu_assign_pointer(newf->fdt, new_fdt) makes sure
our writes are committed to memory before new_fds content is visible to
other threads.
This removes following sparse warning :
fs/file.c:371:3: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different
address spaces)
fs/file.c:371:3: expected struct file *<noident>
fs/file.c:371:3: got struct file [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 4c6992d..8320a8e 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct files_struct *dup_fd(struct files_struct *oldf, int *errorp)
*/
FD_CLR(open_files - i, new_fdt->open_fds);
}
- rcu_assign_pointer(*new_fds++, f);
+ *new_fds++ = f;
}
spin_unlock(&oldf->file_lock);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fs: avoid unecessary smp_wmb() in dup_fd()
2011-05-07 6:30 [PATCH] fs: avoid unecessary smp_wmb() in dup_fd() Eric Dumazet
@ 2011-05-08 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2011-05-08 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Alexander Viro, Matthew Wilcox, linux-fsdevel, Arnd Bergmann,
linux-kernel, Changli Gao
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 08:30:01AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> While copying old_fds array to new_fds, we dont need
> rcu_assign_pointer() and its smp_wmb(), since we are the only thread
> populating new_fds at this point.
>
> A bit later, rcu_assign_pointer(newf->fdt, new_fdt) makes sure
> our writes are committed to memory before new_fds content is visible to
> other threads.
>
> This removes following sparse warning :
>
> fs/file.c:371:3: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different
> address spaces)
> fs/file.c:371:3: expected struct file *<noident>
> fs/file.c:371:3: got struct file [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 4c6992d..8320a8e 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct files_struct *dup_fd(struct files_struct *oldf, int *errorp)
> */
> FD_CLR(open_files - i, new_fdt->open_fds);
> }
> - rcu_assign_pointer(*new_fds++, f);
> + *new_fds++ = f;
> }
> spin_unlock(&oldf->file_lock);
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-08 14:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-07 6:30 [PATCH] fs: avoid unecessary smp_wmb() in dup_fd() Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox