linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:16:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110509161646.GU4122@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506031613.070865192@intel.com>

On Fri 06-05-11 11:08:31, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> This removes writeback_control.wb_start and does more straightforward
> sync livelock prevention by setting .older_than_this to prevent extra
> inodes from being enqueued in the first place.
> 
> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
  Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c         |   16 +++-------------
>  include/linux/writeback.h |    3 ---
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c	2011-05-05 23:30:29.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c	2011-05-05 23:30:30.000000000 +0800
> @@ -544,15 +544,6 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct su
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Was this inode dirtied after sync_sb_inodes was called?
> -		 * This keeps sync from extra jobs and livelock.
> -		 */
> -		if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, wbc->wb_start)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -			return 1;
> -		}
> -
>  		__iget(inode);
>  
>  		pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
> @@ -585,9 +576,6 @@ static void __writeback_inodes_wb(struct
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (!wbc->wb_start)
> -		wbc->wb_start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
> -
>  	while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) {
>  		struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
>  		struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> @@ -686,7 +674,9 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
>  	if (wbc.sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc.tagged_sync)
>  		write_chunk = LONG_MAX;
>  
> -	wbc.wb_start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
> +	oldest_jif = jiffies;
> +	wbc.older_than_this = &oldest_jif;
> +
>  	for (;;) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Stop writeback when nr_pages has been consumed
> --- linux-next.orig/include/linux/writeback.h	2011-05-05 23:30:28.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/include/linux/writeback.h	2011-05-05 23:30:30.000000000 +0800
> @@ -26,9 +26,6 @@ struct writeback_control {
>  	enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
>  	unsigned long *older_than_this;	/* If !NULL, only write back inodes
>  					   older than this */
> -	unsigned long wb_start;         /* Time writeback_inodes_wb was
> -					   called. This is needed to avoid
> -					   extra jobs and livelock */
>  	long nr_to_write;		/* Write this many pages, and decrement
>  					   this for each page written */
>  	long pages_skipped;		/* Pages which were not written */
> 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-09 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06  3:08 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 01/17] writeback: introduce wbc.tagged_sync for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:08   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 02/17] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:33   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10  2:14     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 12:05       ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 03/17] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 14:36   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10  2:23     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 13:52       ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 15:00         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 04/17] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:05   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10  2:40     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 05/17] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 06/17] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 19:02   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-09 16:08   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-09 16:18     ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-10  2:45       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 09/17] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:15   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 10/17] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:16   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 11/17] writeback: add bdi_dirty_limit() kernel-doc Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 12/17] writeback: skip balance_dirty_pages() for in-memory fs Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 13/17] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:54   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10  3:19     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 13:44       ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 14:38         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-11 14:54           ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 15/17] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  4:16   ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 17/17] writeback: trace event writeback_queue_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  4:06 ` [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Anca Emanuel
2011-05-06  4:09   ` Wu Fengguang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-12 13:57 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 10/17] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110509161646.GU4122@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).