From: Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@fluff.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@fluff.org>,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
eric.y.miao@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:08:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110510230832.GE634@freya.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502114616.7813da79@endymion.delvare>
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:46:16AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 10:27:34 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:15:44PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> > > Both AP and CP are contained in Marvell PXA910 silicon. These two ARM
> > > cores are sharing one pair of I2C pins.
> > >
> > > In order to keep I2C transaction operated with atomic, hardware lock
> > > (RIPC) is required. Because of this, bus lock in AP side can't afford
> > > this requirement. Now hardware lock is appended.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> > > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> >
> > Right, this looks like a reasonable explanation of what is going on here
> > and if Jean is happy with the core changes I'll look at where the driver
> > change can go.
>
> Yes I am!
>
> Let me know if you want me to take the core change in my tree or if you
> prefer to have it in yours to avoid a dependency.
if it'll go in my tree ok, then yes.
Will publish a new tree soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-10 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2011042801>
2011-04-28 4:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 8:22 ` Jean Delvare
2011-04-28 8:36 ` Eric Miao
2011-04-28 14:16 ` Jean Delvare
2011-04-28 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-28 14:48 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 14:19 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 4:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: support hardware lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 4:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mmp: add hardware lock support in PXA910 Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-05-02 9:27 ` Ben Dooks
2011-05-02 9:46 ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-10 23:08 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: support hardware lock Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mmp: add hardware lock support in PXA910 Haojian Zhuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110510230832.GE634@freya.fluff.org \
--to=ben-i2c@fluff.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@marvell.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox