From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:38:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110511143807.GA28435@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110510134406.GG4402@quack.suse.cz>
> One more thing that I've noticed while looking through this patch: You
> are removing several trace points (without actually removing the trace
> point definitions BTW):
> trace_wbc_writeback_start(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> trace_wbc_writeback_written(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> trace_wbc_writeback_wait(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> trace_wbc_balance_dirty_start(&wbc, bdi);
> trace_wbc_balance_dirty_written(&wbc, bdi);
> trace_wbc_balance_dirty_wait(&wbc, bdi);
>
> I guess they should be replaced with equivalent trace points that take
> struct wb_writeback_work as an argument instead of just removing them?
OK. How about this change?
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 3 ++
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:20:50.000000000 +0800
@@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
}
retry:
+ trace_writeback_start(wb->bdi, work);
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
if (list_empty(&wb->b_io))
queue_io(wb, work->older_than_this);
@@ -739,6 +740,7 @@ retry:
else
progress = __writeback_inodes_wb(wb, work);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+ trace_writeback_written(wb->bdi, work);
/*
* Did we write something? Try for more
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ retry:
*/
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
if (!list_empty(&wb->b_more_io)) {
+ trace_writeback_wait(wb->bdi, work);
inode = wb_inode(wb->b_more_io.prev);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode_wait_for_writeback(inode, wb);
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:20:50.000000000 +0800
@@ -555,14 +555,17 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
* threshold otherwise wait until the disk writes catch
* up.
*/
+ trace_balance_dirty_start(bdi);
if (bdi_nr_reclaimable > bdi_thresh) {
pages_written += writeback_inodes_wb(&bdi->wb,
write_chunk);
+ trace_balance_dirty_written(bdi, pages_written);
if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
break; /* We've done our duty */
}
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
+ trace_balance_dirty_wait(bdi);
/*
* Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-05-11 22:22:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(writeback_work_class, name,
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_nothread);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_queue);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_exec);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_start);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_written);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_wait);
TRACE_EVENT(writeback_pages_written,
TP_PROTO(long pages_written),
@@ -88,6 +91,30 @@ DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_bdi_reg
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_bdi_unregister);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_thread_start);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_thread_stop);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(balance_dirty_start);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(balance_dirty_wait);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_written,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int written),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bdi, written),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array(char, name, 32)
+ __field(int, written)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strncpy(__entry->name, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+ __entry->written = written;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("bdi %s written %d",
+ __entry->name,
+ __entry->written
+ )
+);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(wbc_class,
TP_PROTO(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct backing_dev_info *bdi),
@@ -137,12 +164,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(wbc_class,
DEFINE_EVENT(wbc_class, name, \
TP_PROTO(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct backing_dev_info *bdi), \
TP_ARGS(wbc, bdi))
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_start);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_written);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_wait);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_start);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_written);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_wait);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writepage);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_congest_waited_template,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 3:08 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 01/17] writeback: introduce wbc.tagged_sync for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 02/17] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:33 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 2:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 12:05 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 03/17] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 14:36 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 2:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 13:52 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 15:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 04/17] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:05 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 2:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 05/17] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 06/17] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 19:02 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-09 16:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-09 16:18 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-10 2:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 09/17] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:15 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 10/17] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:16 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 11/17] writeback: add bdi_dirty_limit() kernel-doc Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 12/17] writeback: skip balance_dirty_pages() for in-memory fs Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 13/17] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:54 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 13:44 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 14:38 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-05-11 14:54 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 15/17] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 4:16 ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 17/17] writeback: trace event writeback_queue_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Anca Emanuel
2011-05-06 4:09 ` Wu Fengguang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-12 13:57 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 14:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-12 23:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13 5:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-16 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16 12:05 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110511143807.GA28435@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).