From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:09:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110512180921.GP11579@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105121302240.28493@router.home>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:03:05PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > even order 3 is causing troubles (which doesn't immediately make lumpy
> > activated, it only activates when priority is < DEF_PRIORITY-2, so
> > after 2 loops failing to reclaim nr_to_reclaim pages), imagine what
>
> That is a significant change for SLUB with the merge of the compaction
> code.
Even before compaction was posted, I had to shut off lumpy reclaim or
it'd hang all the time with frequent order 9 allocations. Maybe lumpy
was better before, maybe lumpy "improved" its reliability recently,
but definitely it wasn't performing well. That definitely applies to
>=2.6.32 (I had to nuke lumpy from it, and only keep compaction
enabled, pretty much like upstream with COMPACTION=y). I think I never
tried earlier lumpy code than 2.6.32, maybe it was less aggressive
back then, I don't exclude it but I thought the whole notion of lumpy
was to takedown everything in the way, which usually leads to process
hanging in swapins or pageins for frequent used memory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-11 15:29 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: slub: Do not wake kswapd for SLUBs speculative " Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: slub: Do not take expensive steps " Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 21:10 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0 Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-11 21:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 19:25 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-12 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:15 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:43 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:46 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:00 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:08 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:30 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-13 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-15 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16 8:42 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-05-12 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:36 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 17:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 15:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 18:37 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 18:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 19:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 19:44 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 22:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 22:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 22:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13 5:39 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13 0:47 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 4:12 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 10:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 6:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 17:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-12 15:45 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-11 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations James Bottomley
2011-05-11 22:28 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 11:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 13:19 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 14:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 18:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-13 11:24 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110512180921.GP11579@random.random \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).