From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, vda.linux@googlemail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] ptrace: move JOBCTL_TRAPPING wait to wait(2) and ptrace_check_attach()
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:20:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110512182006.GA25850@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110512160709.GL1030@htj.dyndns.org>
On 05/12, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:59:10PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > Also. _Perhaps_ we can rethink the SIGCONT trapping, and perhaps in
> > this case do_wait() won't need any changes. May be.
>
> But, if there's a better way, sure.
Unfortunately, I have no any particular ideas right now, and I doubt
I can invent something clean. But I'd like at least to try to think
a bit.
Now about GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING. To simplify the discussion, lets
forget about this series, please recall the previous
"ptrace: use GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING for PTRACE_DETACH too" change.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130486589601593
In short, it changes __ptrace_unlink() to set _TRAPPING if needed,
and ptrace_attach() waits for !TRAPPING unconditionally.
Problem: TRAPPING can be set outside of do_signal_stop() paths, and
I think we should avoid this as much as possible.
(I am ignoring the problem this patch addresses temporary, I think
we can fix it a bit differently).
As we already discussed, this patch is not right, we have the problems
with KILL/CONT. The proposed solution is to clear TRAPPING on kill,
but I think this is not enough.
One particular example. Note that de_thread() waits ->notify_count == 0
in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Btw, this is not good, we need TASK_KILLABLE,
but this doesn't matter in this discussion. The only imporant thing is
that it is practically impossible to make this path restartable.
Note also we have PT_TRACE_EXIT, the sub-thread stops even if killed by
the execing thread. (to clarify, this depends on /dev/random and should
be fixed, and in fact it is debatable whether it should stop, please
ignore).
Now suppose we are tracing 2 threads, T1 execs and kills T2, T2 reports
PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT. Now, if the tracer waits for !(T1 & TRAPPING), it will
wait forever.
Say, the thread group was stopped, the tracer PTRACE_CONT's T1, it calls
sys_execve() and reports the trap from syscall_trace_enter().
The tracer does ptrace(T1, DETACH) + ptrace(T1, SEIZE) and hangs forever.
Once again, this is only one example. coredump, vfork, probably something
else. In short: I think that TRAPPING-outside-of-do_signal_stop is the
can of worms.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-08 15:48 [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 01/11] job control: rename signal->group_stop and flags to jobctl and rearrange flags Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 02/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE Tejun Heo
2011-05-09 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 9:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 13:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 13:47 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-15 15:56 ` PTRACE_SEIZE should not stop [Re: [PATCH 02/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 16:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:15 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 19:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 8:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:42 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 13:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 13:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 03/11] ptrace: ptrace_check_attach(): rename @kill to @ignore_state and add comments Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 04/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_INTERRUPT Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 21:58 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-09 10:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 16:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 9:50 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 14:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 18:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 17:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 21:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 9:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 12:23 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 13:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 16:20 ` Bryan Donlan
2011-05-11 19:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 16:10 ` PTRACE_DETACH without stop [Re: [PATCH 04/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_INTERRUPT] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 9:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 05/11] ptrace: restructure ptrace_getsiginfo() Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] ptrace: make group stop state visible via PTRACE_GETSIGINFO Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 8:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] ptrace: add JOBCTL_TRAPPED Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] ptrace: move fallback JOBCTL_TRAPPING clearing to get_signal_to_deliver() Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 19:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 15:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped() Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 19:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 16:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 8:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-13 17:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-14 10:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 14:40 ` waitpid(WNOHANG) should report SIGCHLD-notified signals [Re: [PATCH 09/11] job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped()] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] ptrace: move JOBCTL_TRAPPING wait to wait(2) and ptrace_check_attach() Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 19:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 19:53 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 10:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 16:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 16:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-13 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-13 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] ptrace: implement group stop notification for ptracer Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 22:42 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 10:10 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 22:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 9:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 12:01 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 13:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 20:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 20:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 10:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 14:02 ` getter PTRACE_GETSIGINFO should not modify anything [Re: [PATCH 11/11] ptrace: implement group stop notification for ptracer] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 14:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 17:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 20:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-08 22:27 ` [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 9:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 13:55 ` ptrace-testsuite status [Re: [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification] Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110512182006.GA25850@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).