From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Make the x86-64 stacktrace code safely callable from scheduler
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:43:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110512214336.GE7410@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110512212810.GA17596@elte.hu>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:28:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Avoid potential scheduler recursion and deadlock from the
> > stacktrace code by avoiding rescheduling when we re-enable
> > preemption.
> >
> > This robustifies some scheduler trace events like sched switch
> > when they are used to produce callchains in perf or ftrace.
>
> > - put_cpu();
> > +
> > + /* We want stacktrace to be computable anywhere, even in the scheduler */
> > + preempt_enable_no_resched();
>
> So what happens if a callchain profiling happens to be interrupted by a hardirq
> and the interrupt reschedules the current task? We'll miss the reschedule,
> right?
>
> preempt_enable_no_resched() is not a magic 'solve scheduler recursions' bullet
> - it's to be used only if something else will guarantee the preemption check!
> But nothing guarantees it here AFAICS.
>
> A better fix would be to use local_irq_save()/restore().
Good point, but then lockdep itself might trigger a stacktrace from local_irq_save,
leading to a stacktrace recursion.
I can use raw_local_irq_disable(), or may be have a stacktrace recursion protection.
I fear the second solution could lead us to potentially lose useful information
if a stacktrace interrupts another one. Ok these are extreme cases...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-12 20:32 [GIT PULL] x86 stacktrace updates Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove warning and warning_symbol from struct stacktrace_ops Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-14 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-14 13:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 20:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Make the x86-64 stacktrace code safely callable from scheduler Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 20:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 21:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-05-12 21:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 10:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-13 12:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-13 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110512214336.GE7410@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox