From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix and optimise calculation of the weight-inverse
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110516111610.GD19837@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-0pz0wnyalr4tk4ln11xwumdx@git.kernel.org>
* tip-bot for Stephan Baerwolf <stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de> wrote:
> Commit-ID: db670dac49b5423b39b5e523d28fe32045d71b10
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/db670dac49b5423b39b5e523d28fe32045d71b10
> Author: Stephan Baerwolf <stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:03:29 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> CommitDate: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:01:18 +0200
Just want to highlight this aspect of Stephan's scheduler fix for the lkml
discussion:
> [ This could explain some aritmetical issues for small shares but nothing
> concrete has been reported yet so we are not confident enough to queue
> this up in sched/urgent and for -stable backport. But if anyone finds
> this commit and sees it to fix some badness then we can certainly
> change our mind! ]
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
So this could be a -stable candidate because it's a fix and it's simple, except
that at the moment we have no reason to believe that this is a regression or a
serious bug.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-16 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-16 10:38 [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix and optimise calculation of the weight-inverse tip-bot for Stephan Baerwolf
2011-05-16 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110516111610.GD19837@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox