linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:37:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110516133748.GB2058@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305306135.2466.173.camel@twins>

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:02:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:42 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > - rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop() call set_cpus_allowed_ptr() again
> > > periodically.
> > >  then, it can reset cpumask if cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() change it.
> > >  my debug print obseve following cpumask change occur at boot time.
> > >     1) kthread_bind: bind cpu1
> > >     2) cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback: bind possible cpu
> > >     3) rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop: rebind cpu1
> > > - while tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1, sched load balancer never be crash.
> > 
> > Seems rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread() call wake_up_process() directly,
> > which is under hotplug event CPU_UP_PREPARE. Maybe it should be
> > under CPU_ONLINE. 
> 
> IIRC I talked to Paul about this a while back and ONLINE is too late,
> however STARTING should work. At the time he couldn't quite get that to
> work, but the above situation is indeed the root cause of our problems.
> 
> We shouldn't try to run a cpu affine thread before the cpu in question
> is actually able to run stuff.

But I'm afraid this patch still doesn't help. 
If I understand your patch correctly, you just put the wake up to CPU_STARTING,
but it's still before CPU_ONLINE.
Please check my mail to Paul's in this thread group.

Thanks,
Yong

> 
> I did me a little hackery and with the below patch my kernel still
> boots...
> 
> Would that sort your issue?
> 
> ---
>  kernel/rcutree.c        |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 5616b17..e0218ed 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1656,7 +1656,6 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread(int cpu)
>  	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_cpu, cpu) = cpu;
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) != NULL);
>  	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) = t;
> -	wake_up_process(t);
>  	sp.sched_priority = RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO;
>  	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1764,13 +1763,33 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
>  		rnp->node_kthread_task = t;
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -		wake_up_process(t);
>  		sp.sched_priority = 99;
>  		sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
>  	}
>  	return rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rsp, rnp, rnp_index);
>  }
>  
> +static void __cpuinit rcu_wake_cpu_kthread(int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *p = per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu);
> +
> +	if (p)
> +		wake_up_process(p);
> +}
> +
> +static void __cpuinit rcu_wake_node_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> +{
> +	if (!rnp)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (rnp->node_kthread_task)
> +		wake_up_process(rnp->node_kthread_task);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
> +	if (rnp->boost_kthread_task)
> +		wake_up_process(rnp->boost_kthread_task);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Spawn all kthreads -- called as soon as the scheduler is running.
>   */
> @@ -1783,19 +1802,24 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_kthreads(void)
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		init_waitqueue_head(&per_cpu(rcu_cpu_wq, cpu));
>  		per_cpu(rcu_cpu_has_work, cpu) = 0;
> -		if (cpu_online(cpu))
> +		if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
>  			(void)rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread(cpu);
> +			rcu_wake_cpu_kthread(cpu);
> +		}
>  	}
>  	rnp = rcu_get_root(rcu_state);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->node_wq);
>  	rcu_init_boost_waitqueue(rnp);
>  	(void)rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(rcu_state, rnp);
> -	if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1)
> +	rcu_wake_node_kthread(rnp);
> +	if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1) {
>  		rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rcu_state, rnp) {
>  			init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->node_wq);
>  			rcu_init_boost_waitqueue(rnp);
>  			(void)rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(rcu_state, rnp);
> +			rcu_wake_node_kthread(rnp);
>  		}
> +	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  early_initcall(rcu_spawn_kthreads);
> @@ -2206,7 +2230,7 @@ static void __cpuinit rcu_online_cpu(int cpu)
>  	rcu_preempt_init_percpu_data(cpu);
>  }
>  
> -static void __cpuinit rcu_online_kthreads(int cpu)
> +static void __cpuinit rcu_prepare_kthreads(int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
>  	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
> @@ -2233,7 +2257,15 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>  	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
>  	case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
>  		rcu_online_cpu(cpu);
> -		rcu_online_kthreads(cpu);
> +		rcu_prepare_kthreads(cpu);
> +		break;
> +	case CPU_STARTING:
> +		rcu_wake_cpu_kthread(cpu);
> +		do {
> +			struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
> +		       	if (rdp)
> +				rcu_wake_node_kthread(rdp->mynode);
> +		} while (0);
>  		break;
>  	case CPU_ONLINE:
>  	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index ed339702..961a316 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -1306,7 +1306,6 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
>  	rnp->boost_kthread_task = t;
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -	wake_up_process(t);
>  	sp.sched_priority = RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO;
>  	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
>  	return 0;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-16 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-28 14:20 [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 10:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:55     ` [PATCH 1/2] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-11 16:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13  5:48         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  6:42           ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  7:33             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  7:43               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  9:34                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 17:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-14 11:17               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 13:37               ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-05-19  8:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:54                   ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-15 18:55             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 13:26               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19  6:06                 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  6:08                   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-28 16:35                     ` [tip:sched/urgent] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(), " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20 10:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21  9:54                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  8:34                   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:50                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  9:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:12                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 11:41                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 22:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-19  8:55                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-02 10:56     ` [PATCH 2/2] sched, cpuset: introduce do_set_cpus_allowed() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 12:58     ` [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110516133748.GB2058@zhy \
    --to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).