linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events() properly wait for work cancellation
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:47:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110517154748.GS20624@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110517102853.GL20624@htj.dyndns.org>

disk_block_events() should guarantee that the event work is not in
flight on return and once blocked it shouldn't issue further
cancellations.

Because there was no synchronization between the first blocker doing
cancel_delayed_work_sync() and the following blockers, the following
blockers could finish before cancellation was complete, which broke
both guarantees - event work could be in flight and cancellation could
happen after return.

This bug triggered WARN_ON_ONCE() in disk_clear_events() reported in
bug#34662.

  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34662

Fix it by adding an outer mutex which protects both block count
manipulation and work cancellation.

-v2: Use outer mutex instead of bit waitqueue per Linus.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Reported-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
---
Yeap, it's so much simpler this way.  Thanks.

 block/genhd.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Index: work/block/genhd.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/block/genhd.c
+++ work/block/genhd.c
@@ -1371,6 +1371,7 @@ struct disk_events {
 	struct gendisk		*disk;		/* the associated disk */
 	spinlock_t		lock;
 
+	struct mutex		block_mutex;	/* protects blocking */
 	int			block;		/* event blocking depth */
 	unsigned int		pending;	/* events already sent out */
 	unsigned int		clearing;	/* events being cleared */
@@ -1438,12 +1439,20 @@ void disk_block_events(struct gendisk *d
 	if (!ev)
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Outer mutex ensures that the first blocker completes canceling
+	 * the event work before further blockers are allowed to finish.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&ev->block_mutex);
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ev->lock, flags);
 	cancel = !ev->block++;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ev->lock, flags);
 
 	if (cancel)
 		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&disk->ev->dwork);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ev->block_mutex);
 }
 
 static void __disk_unblock_events(struct gendisk *disk, bool check_now)
@@ -1751,6 +1760,7 @@ static void disk_add_events(struct gendi
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ev->node);
 	ev->disk = disk;
 	spin_lock_init(&ev->lock);
+	mutex_init(&ev->block_mutex);
 	ev->block = 1;
 	ev->poll_msecs = -1;
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ev->dwork, disk_events_workfn);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-17 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-17 10:27 [PATCH RESEND 1/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: don't use non-syncing event blocking in disk_check_events() Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 10:28 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: remove non-syncing __disk_block_events() and fold it into disk_block_events() Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 10:28   ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events() properly wait for work cancellation Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 14:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-17 15:11       ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 15:15         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-17 15:27           ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 22:40             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-18  5:07               ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18  9:46                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-18 10:04                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 11:07                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 10:26                   ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-17 15:47     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-05-17 19:34       ` [PATCH UPDATED " Jens Axboe
2011-05-17 20:22         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110517154748.GS20624@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    --cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).