linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	kyungmin.park@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PM / Core: partial resume/suspend API for suspend_again users.
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 22:52:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105172252.32135.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305608346-23800-2-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>

On Tuesday, May 17, 2011, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> The API, suspend_again, is supposed to be used by platforms when the
> platforms want to execute some code while suspended (wakeup by an alarm
> or periodic ticks, run code, suspend again). Because suspend_again is
> not called when every device is resumed, but is called right after
> suspend_enter() is called, the suspend_again callback should include
> device resume and suspend features.
> 
> This patch provides two APIs: dpm_partial_resume and
> dpm_partial_suspend. They are supposed to be used in suspend_again to
> actiavte required devices.
> 
> A usage example is:
> 
> /* Devices required to run "monitor_something()". */
> static device *devs[] = {
> 	&console_serial,
> 	&device_x,
> 	&device_y,
> 	...
> };
> 
> bool example_suspend_again(void)
> {
> 	int error, monitor_result;
> 
> 	if (!wakeup_reason_is_polling())
> 		return false;
> 
> 	dpm_partial_resume(PMSG_RESUME, devs, ARRAY_SIZE(devs));

I'm not sure you need the first argument here.  Also, if the array is
NULL terminated, you won't need the third one.

> 	resume_console();
> 
> 	monitor_result = monitor_something();
> 
> 	suspend_console();
> 	error = dpm_partial_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND, devs, ARRAY_SIZE(devs));

Same here.

> 	if (error || monitor_result == ERROR)
> 		return false;
> 
> 	return true;
> }

That said, I don't like this patch.  The reason is that you call
suspend_enter() is a loop and it calls the _noirq() callbacks for
_all_ devices and now you're going to only call .resume() and
.suspend() for several selected devices.  This is not too consistent.

I wonder if those devices needed for .suspend_again() to work on
your platform could be resumed and suspended by their drivers'
_noirq() callbacks?

Rafael


> Tested at Exynos4-NURI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> --
> No changes from v3.
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/main.c |  154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pm.h        |    4 +
>  2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index 052dc53..71dc693 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -1082,3 +1082,157 @@ int device_pm_wait_for_dev(struct device *subordinate, struct device *dev)
>  	return async_error;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_pm_wait_for_dev);
> +
> +/**
> + * __dpm_partial_resume - Execute "resume" callbacks for the listed devices.
> + * @state: PM transition being carried out.
> + * @devs: Array of pointers for the devices being resumed
> + * @size: The size of devs array.
> + */
> +static void __dpm_partial_resume(pm_message_t state, struct device **devs,
> +				 int size)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +		int error;
> +
> +		dev = devs[i];
> +		get_device(dev);
> +
> +		error = device_resume(dev, state, false);
> +		if (error)
> +			pm_dev_err(dev, state, "", error);
> +
> +		put_device(dev);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __dpm_partial_complete - Complete a PM transition for the listed devices.
> + * @state: PM transition being carried out.
> + * @devs: Array of pointers for the devices being resumed
> + * @size: The size of devs array.
> + */
> +static void __dpm_partial_complete(pm_message_t state, struct device **devs,
> +				   int size)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +		dev = devs[i];
> +
> +		get_device(dev);
> +		dev->power.in_suspend = false;
> +
> +		device_complete(dev, state);
> +
> +		put_device(dev);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * dpm_partial_resume - Execute "resume" callbacks and complete system
> + *			transaction for the chosen devices only.
> + * @state: PM transition being carried out.
> + * @devs: Array of pointers for the devices being resumed
> + * @size: The size of devs array.
> + *
> + * Execute "resume" callbacks for the listed devices and complete the PM
> + * transition of them.
> + *
> + * Because the only a part of devices will be resumed, asynchronous resume
> + * is dropped.
> + */
> +void dpm_partial_resume(pm_message_t state, struct device **devs, int size)
> +{
> +	/* Partial dpm_resume */
> +	__dpm_partial_resume(state, devs, size);
> +
> +	/* Partial dpm_complete */
> +	__dpm_partial_complete(state, devs, size);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpm_partial_resume);
> +
> +/**
> + * dpm_partial_suspend - Prepare the given devices for PM transition and
> + *			suspend them.
> + * @state: PM transition being carried out.
> + * @devs: Array of pointers for the devices being suspended
> + * @size: The size of devs array.
> + *
> + * Prepare the given devices for system PM transition and execute "suspend"
> + * callbacks for them.
> + *
> + * The devs array is iterated in the reversed order to use the same devs
> + * array with dpm_partial_resume().
> + */
> +int dpm_partial_suspend(pm_message_t state, struct device **devs, int size)
> +{
> +	int error = 0, i;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +
> +	/* Partial dpm_prepare */
> +	for (i = size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		dev = devs[i];
> +
> +		get_device(dev);
> +
> +		pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
> +		if (pm_runtime_barrier(dev) && device_may_wakeup(dev))
> +			pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
> +
> +		pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> +		error = pm_wakeup_pending() ?
> +				-EBUSY : device_prepare(dev, state);
> +
> +		if (error) {
> +			if (error == -EAGAIN) {
> +				put_device(dev);
> +				error = 0;
> +				i++; /* Try Again */
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +			printk(KERN_INFO "PM: Device %s not prepared "
> +				"for power transition: code %d\n",
> +				dev_name(dev), error);
> +			put_device(dev);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		dev->power.in_suspend = true;
> +		put_device(dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		goto err_prepare;
> +
> +	/* Partial dpm_suspend */
> +	for (i = size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		dev = devs[i];
> +
> +		get_device(dev);
> +
> +		/* Synchronous suspend. The list shouldn't be long */
> +		error = __device_suspend(dev, pm_transition, false);
> +
> +		if (error) {
> +			pm_dev_err(dev, state, "", error);
> +			put_device(dev);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		put_device(dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!error)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	__dpm_partial_resume(PMSG_RESUME, devs + i + 1, size - i - 1);
> +	i = -1;
> +err_prepare:
> +	__dpm_partial_complete(PMSG_RESUME, devs + i + 1, size - i - 1);
> +
> +	return error;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpm_partial_suspend);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index 512e091..b407762 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -540,10 +540,14 @@ static inline int sysdev_resume(void) { return 0; }
>  extern void device_pm_lock(void);
>  extern void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state);
>  extern void dpm_resume_end(pm_message_t state);
> +extern void dpm_partial_resume(pm_message_t state, struct device **devs,
> +			       int size);
>  
>  extern void device_pm_unlock(void);
>  extern int dpm_suspend_noirq(pm_message_t state);
>  extern int dpm_suspend_start(pm_message_t state);
> +extern int dpm_partial_suspend(pm_message_t state, struct device **devs,
> +			       int size);
>  
>  extern void __suspend_report_result(const char *function, void *fn, int ret);
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-17 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-11  5:18 [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] PM / Core: suspend_again callback for suspend_ops MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-11  5:18 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] PM / Core: partial resume/suspend API for suspend_again users MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-12  6:19 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] PM / Core: suspend_again callback for suspend_ops Pavel Machek
2011-05-17  4:59   ` [PATCH v4 " MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-17  4:59     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PM / Core: partial resume/suspend API for suspend_again users MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-17 20:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-05-18  5:58         ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-18 20:18           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-17 20:40     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PM / Core: suspend_again callback for suspend_ops Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-18  9:07       ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-05-18 20:20         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201105172252.32135.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@gmail.com \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).