Re: [PATCH 00/15] [GIT PULL] ftrace/recordmcount: cleanups and updates for recordmcount processing

Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18T18:13:17Z

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:08 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Ingo,
> >
> > Please pull the latest tip/perf/core-2 tree, which can be found at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> > tip/perf/core-2
> >
>
> Note, this is not based off of my tip/perf/core branch, but is based off
> of tip separately.

I pulled your tip/perf/core (b9df92d2a94e) on May 1, almost 3 weeks ago, into
tip:perf/core.

> I'm not sure why you don't want to pull my tip/perf/core directly yet.

Because i already have? :-)

> [...] I'd like to get that infrastructure in and tested before the 40 merge
> window so that we can focus on the perf function tracing in the 41 window,
> and not try to figure out where bugs are between the two.
>
> That pull request is here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130469692420787

Well, that is an RFC patchset, named:

[RFC][PATCH 00/13] ftrace: Allow multiple users to pick and choose functions

In that mail you specifically said:

" I'm posting this patch series as an RFC, but I do not expect it to change
much. I still have to put it through more tests even though I ran several on
each set already. "

... with no pull vector in it. If you want me to pull something you need to put
it into a branch i can see and you need to send a pull request :-)

Thanks,

Ingo