linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>,
	Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] add mount options to sysfs
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:05:45 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518170545.GA4435@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110518163951.GA24143@suse.de>

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:39 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:31:44PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > Currently there is no good way to effectively globally restrict an
> > access to sysfs files.  It's possible only to chmod the sysfs'
> > root/directories to fully deny access to sysfs (sub-)tree to some users
> > or chmod files after they are created.  The latter approach is racy,
> > however.
> 
> Why do you want to do this?  What is in sysfs files that is not
> gloabally ok to access?  That should be fixed first, if at all, instead
> of wanting to modify the whole sysfs tree, right?

I don't hide the goal (I didn't find any other weird permissions, if
you mean this).  It is primary about additional global controlable
layer of defining permission:

1) *IF* another sensitive file with weird permissions is found, mount
option is IMO the best temporary workaround.

2) Somebody might be worried about information leaks via world readable
files - not strict bugs, but leaks in sense of local policy.  See numerous
discussions about hiding kernel addresses - there is no unified opinion
about it.  Some admins would be happy with denying access to almost all
system information except some white list.

> > The patch introduces sysfs mount options parsing and adds 4 new options:
> > uid, gid, mode and umask.  uid, gid, and umask are classical options,
> > mode is a global restricting mode mask that defined the most relaxed
> > possible file mode.  E.g. if mode=0750 then "chmod 0664" changes file's
> > permissions to 0640.
> 
> What is going to break if you do this?  Have you tested it?  I'd be very
> worried about this.

I've tested it on my laptop (I'm writing booted with this kernel).  By
default nothing has changed (umask=0000, mode=0777).  Mounting sysfs
with mode=0770 leads to the predictable state - no sysfs information is
available to nonroot, e.g.  no ACPI battery state.  umask is tested with
pluging a USB flash.

mode has one advantage over umask.  It is temporary - "mount -o
remount,mode=0777" restores the initial state.


I'd want to implement similar options for debugfs.

Thanks,

-- 
Vasiliy

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-18 16:31 [RFC] add mount options to sysfs Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-18 16:39 ` Greg KH
2011-05-18 17:05   ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-05-18 19:17     ` Greg KH
2011-05-19  6:26       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-19 17:12         ` Greg KH
2011-05-20  9:59           ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-20 13:30             ` Greg KH
2011-05-20 13:34               ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-20 13:36                 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-20 13:54                   ` Greg KH
2011-05-20 15:17                     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110518170545.GA4435@albatros \
    --to=segoon@openwall.com \
    --cc=eugeneteo@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).