From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>,
Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] add mount options to sysfs
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:26:23 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519062622.GA4418@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110518191727.GA26741@suse.de>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:17 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > 1) *IF* another sensitive file with weird permissions is found, mount
> > option is IMO the best temporary workaround.
>
> Maybe, but fixing the file would be the obvious solution.
I mean for a sysadmin, not for a developer.
What do you mean by "breaking system"? Root is able to chmod
and chown sysfs files already, he may do "chmod -R" or similar.
I suggest sane, race free way to globally restrict permissions *IF* root
wants it.
Here https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/300 you, not aware of usefull
applications of world-writable debugfs file, agreeded to statically
restrict permissions of all files. I suggest more flexible and
configurable in runtime solution. It doesn't break anything - default
behaviour doesn't differ from current one. What has changed in your
mind since 2/25?
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 16:31 [RFC] add mount options to sysfs Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-18 16:39 ` Greg KH
2011-05-18 17:05 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-18 19:17 ` Greg KH
2011-05-19 6:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-05-19 17:12 ` Greg KH
2011-05-20 9:59 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-20 13:30 ` Greg KH
2011-05-20 13:34 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-20 13:36 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-05-20 13:54 ` Greg KH
2011-05-20 15:17 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110519062622.GA4418@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=eugeneteo@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).