linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 05:31:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519213119.GA19782@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110513030810.GB8016@localhost>

> > > @@ -419,6 +419,15 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
> > >  	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > >  	inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC;
> > >  	if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Sync livelock prevention. Each inode is tagged and synced in
> > > +		 * one shot, so we can unconditionally update its dirty time to
> > > +		 * prevent syncing it again. Note that time ordering of b_dirty
> > > +		 * list will be kept because the following code either removes
> > > +		 * the inode from b_dirty or calls redirty_tail().
> > > +		 */
> > > +		if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_sync)
> > > +			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> > 
> > Shouldn't this  update only ocur if the inode is still dirty?
> 
> Yeah, that would be better even though the current form won't lead to
> errors.
> 
> Let's add one more test (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)?
> (I was actually aware of the trade offs and didn't bother to add it..)

Oops, the (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) test is not enough because
when the inode is actively dirtied, I_DIRTY_PAGES won't be set when
the flusher is writing out the pages with I_SYNC set...

Well it would look clumsy to add another mapping_tagged(mapping,
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY) test. So I tend to revert to the original scheme
of updating ->dirtied_when only on newly dirtied pages. It's the
simplest form that can avoid unnecessarily polluting ->dirtied_when.

@@ -432,6 +432,15 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
 				requeue_io(inode);
 			} else {
 				/*
+				 * Sync livelock prevention. Each inode is
+				 * tagged and synced in one shot, so we can
+				 * unconditionally update its dirty time to
+				 * prevent syncing it again.
+				 */
+				if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL ||
+				    wbc->tagged_writepages)
+					inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
+				/*
 				 * Writeback blocked by something other than
 				 * congestion. Delay the inode for some time to
 				 * avoid spinning on the CPU (100% iowait)

Thanks,
Fengguang

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-19 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-12 13:57 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 01/17] writeback: introduce .tagged_sync for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 22:40   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13  2:56     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-13 10:17       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-15 23:43       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16  5:39         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-19 21:17           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 02/17] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 22:42   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13  3:08     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-19 21:31       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-05-23 13:14         ` Jan Kara
2011-05-24  3:03           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 03/17] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 22:44   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13  3:36     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-15 23:50       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16 10:40         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-16 11:14           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 04/17] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 05/17] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 06/17] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 22:55   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16 13:00     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 07/17] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 08/17] writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 09/17] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 10/17] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 11/17] writeback: add bdi_dirty_limit() kernel-doc Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 12/17] writeback: skip balance_dirty_pages() for in-memory fs Wu Fengguang
2011-05-16 10:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-16 10:49     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 13/17] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 14:25   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 23:04   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13  5:03     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-15 23:54       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 14:56   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-12 23:18   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13  5:28     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-16  0:12       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16 12:05         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 15/17] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 23:20   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13  5:37     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-16  0:14       ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16 12:21         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 17/17] writeback: trace event writeback_queue_io Wu Fengguang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-06  3:08 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06  3:08 ` [PATCH 02/17] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:33   ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10  2:14     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 12:05       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110519213119.GA19782@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).