public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x32-abi@googlegroups.com,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: X32 project status update
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:27:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105211727.35985.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinM_=bAjD59=GiKtTvjLtoOs7KCFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
> This is the x32 project status update:
> 
> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
> 

I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically
looks all good, but the system call table appears to
diverge from the x86_64 list for no (documented) reason,
in the calls above 302. Is that intentional?

I can see why you might want to keep the numbers identical,
but if they are already different, why not use the generic
system call table from asm-generic/unistd.h for the new
ABI?

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-21 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-21 15:01 X32 project status update H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 15:27 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-05-21 15:34   ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 16:27     ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 18:55       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-21 19:39         ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-21 20:01         ` Anvin, H Peter
2011-05-21 23:48           ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-22 20:02             ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-22 21:15               ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-23 16:59   ` Anvin, H Peter
2011-06-17  3:13 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-29 21:29   ` H.J. Lu
2011-11-24 23:58 ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201105211727.35985.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x32-abi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox