public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:55:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110523105522.GC24674@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=Vbr+DRBy6sa7omGpvAb0uGunYMA@mail.gmail.com>


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >      24594a2bfcaa: [PATCH] x86-64 merge
> >
> >     - Remove some unneeded prefetches.  Just two are enough to kickstart
> >       the hardware prefetcher.
> >
> >   But despite touching prefetches explicitly, this too sloppily left the (now
> >   dangling) prefetch.h include file around.
> 
> Well, developer removes include, developer risks compile breakage.

If developer removes the final prefetch() from an unrelated header he might as 
well think of removing the prefetch.h header. If there's compile breakage we 
want to fix the breakage.

But yes, this is easily forgotten and the basic psychology is for header file 
dependencies to grow, almost never to shrink.

To counteract that in a really good way we need tooling help - we are fighting 
entropy here ...

> > Anway, what i tried to demonstrate with this mail how much *real* slowdown 
> > in the kernel build our current header file bloat is causing. We could 
> > literally halve our kernel build times if we fixed this!
> 
> News at 11!

I have not seen *actual hard numbers* measured before, so how exactly is this 
news at 11? So i think your condescending reply is neither fair nor justified.

Yes, we all knew that there's build time costs of header bloat - but it was 
never AFAIK measured and posted to lkml in such a clear way.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-23 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  6:12 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20 15:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-20 16:16   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 16:29     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-23  9:09   ` [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown Ingo Molnar
2011-05-23 10:21     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-05-23 10:55       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-23 11:13         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-05-23 11:51           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-23 16:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-23 17:01       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-23 16:19     ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-05-28  0:36     ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-05-28 14:40       ` [PATCH] Fixes to the module.h splitup tree Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110523105522.GC24674@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox