* [PATCH 2/3] perf_events: fix validation of events using an extra reg (v3)
@ 2011-05-23 16:12 Stephane Eranian
2011-05-30 13:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2011-05-23 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: mingo, peterz, andi, ming.m.lin
The validate_group() function needs to validate events with
extra shared regs. Within an event group, only events with
the same value for the extra reg can co-exist. This was not
checked by validate_group() because it was missing the
shared_regs logic.
This patch changes the allocation of the fake cpuc used for
validation to also point to a fake shared_regs structure such
that group events be properly testing.
It modifies __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints() to use
spin_lock_irqsave() to avoid lockdep issues.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 0f8d3ff..ed6af75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1682,6 +1682,40 @@ static int x86_pmu_commit_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * a fake_cpuc is used to validate event groups. Due to
+ * the extra reg logic, we need to also allocate a fake
+ * per_core and per_cpu structure. Otherwise, group events
+ * using extra reg may conflict without the kernel being
+ * able to catch this when the last event gets added to
+ * the group.
+ */
+static void free_fake_cpuc(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ kfree(cpuc->shared_regs);
+ kfree(cpuc);
+}
+
+static struct cpu_hw_events *allocate_fake_cpuc(void)
+{
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ cpuc = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpuc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cpuc)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ /* only needed, if we have extra_regs */
+ if (x86_pmu.extra_regs) {
+ cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
+ if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
+ goto error;
+ }
+ return cpuc;
+error:
+ free_fake_cpuc(cpuc);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+}
/*
* validate that we can schedule this event
@@ -1692,9 +1726,9 @@ static int validate_event(struct perf_event *event)
struct event_constraint *c;
int ret = 0;
- fake_cpuc = kmalloc(sizeof(*fake_cpuc), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
- if (!fake_cpuc)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ fake_cpuc = allocate_fake_cpuc();
+ if (IS_ERR(fake_cpuc))
+ return PTR_ERR(fake_cpuc);
c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);
@@ -1704,7 +1738,7 @@ static int validate_event(struct perf_event *event)
if (x86_pmu.put_event_constraints)
x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);
- kfree(fake_cpuc);
+ free_fake_cpuc(fake_cpuc);
return ret;
}
@@ -1724,35 +1758,32 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
struct cpu_hw_events *fake_cpuc;
- int ret, n;
+ int ret = -ENOSPC, n;
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- fake_cpuc = kmalloc(sizeof(*fake_cpuc), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
- if (!fake_cpuc)
- goto out;
+ fake_cpuc = allocate_fake_cpuc();
+ if (IS_ERR(fake_cpuc))
+ return PTR_ERR(fake_cpuc);
/*
* the event is not yet connected with its
* siblings therefore we must first collect
* existing siblings, then add the new event
* before we can simulate the scheduling
*/
- ret = -ENOSPC;
n = collect_events(fake_cpuc, leader, true);
if (n < 0)
- goto out_free;
+ goto out;
fake_cpuc->n_events = n;
n = collect_events(fake_cpuc, event, false);
if (n < 0)
- goto out_free;
+ goto out;
fake_cpuc->n_events = n;
ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(fake_cpuc, n, NULL);
-out_free:
- kfree(fake_cpuc);
out:
+ free_fake_cpuc(fake_cpuc);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 2d40f33..4ae1e99 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1027,14 +1027,18 @@ __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
{
struct event_constraint *c = &emptyconstraint;
struct er_account *era;
+ unsigned long flags;
/* already allocated shared msr */
- if (reg->alloc || !cpuc->shared_regs)
+ if (reg->alloc)
return &unconstrained;
era = &cpuc->shared_regs->regs[reg->idx];
-
- raw_spin_lock(&era->lock);
+ /*
+ * we use spin_lock_irqsave() to avoid lockdep issues when
+ * passing a fake cpuc
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&era->lock, flags);
if (!atomic_read(&era->ref) || era->config == reg->config) {
@@ -1058,7 +1062,7 @@ __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
*/
c = &unconstrained;
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&era->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&era->lock, flags);
return c;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf_events: fix validation of events using an extra reg (v3)
2011-05-23 16:12 [PATCH 2/3] perf_events: fix validation of events using an extra reg (v3) Stephane Eranian
@ 2011-05-30 13:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-30 13:16 ` Stephane Eranian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2011-05-30 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephane Eranian; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, andi, ming.m.lin
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 18:12 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> +static struct cpu_hw_events *allocate_fake_cpuc(void)
> +{
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + cpuc = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpuc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cpuc)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + /* only needed, if we have extra_regs */
> + if (x86_pmu.extra_regs) {
> + cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
> + if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
> + goto error;
> + }
> + return cpuc;
> +error:
> + free_fake_cpuc(cpuc);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +}
Ingo found a case where that use of allocate_shared_regs() failed to
compile but didn't provide a .config. I suspect its CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
and the below should fix it. I will try to push that again later today.
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 41178c8..cf90e31 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1528,4 +1623,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_init(void)
return 0;
}
+static struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf_events: fix validation of events using an extra reg (v3)
2011-05-30 13:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2011-05-30 13:16 ` Stephane Eranian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2011-05-30 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: LKML, mingo@elte.hu, Andi Kleen, Lin Ming
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 18:12 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > +static struct cpu_hw_events *allocate_fake_cpuc(void)
> > +{
> > + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +
> > + cpuc = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpuc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!cpuc)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + /* only needed, if we have extra_regs */
> > + if (x86_pmu.extra_regs) {
> > + cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
> > + if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + return cpuc;
> > +error:
> > + free_fake_cpuc(cpuc);
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +}
>
> Ingo found a case where that use of allocate_shared_regs() failed to
> compile but didn't provide a .config. I suspect its CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
> and the below should fix it. I will try to push that again later today.
>
Yes, it is quite possible. I think you are right about the cause of
this problem.
The alloate routine is in the Intel-specific code. If you don't
compile for Intel
then you will get an undefined symbol. It is not clear to me why you would
compile with Intel support, though.
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 41178c8..cf90e31 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -1528,4 +1623,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-30 13:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-23 16:12 [PATCH 2/3] perf_events: fix validation of events using an extra reg (v3) Stephane Eranian
2011-05-30 13:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-30 13:16 ` Stephane Eranian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox