From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu
Subject: Re: ptrace_resume->wake_up_process (Was: Ptrace documentation, draft #1)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:23:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110523172352.GA30226@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimaN8U8_sWT_q_ZDZkA51jqWPHkiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > In fact ptrace_resume()->wake_up_process() is obviously wrong anyway,
> > I think the patch below makes sense even for 2.6.40.
>
> Send me a signed-off version with a somewhat cleaned-up commit
> message, and we can make that happen.
Ah, I sent the patch a minute ago.
> Or a pull request ..
Whatever is more convenient for you. If everyone agree with this change,
I'll add it to ptrace branch and send [GIT PULL] tomorrow.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-23 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-15 20:35 Ptrace documentation, draft #1 Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-16 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 15:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 16:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 17:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-18 15:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-18 15:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-19 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-20 18:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-23 12:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 14:10 ` ptrace_resume->wake_up_process (Was: Ptrace documentation, draft #1) Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-23 17:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-25 20:08 ` [GIT PULL] PTRACE_KILL/wakeup fix for v2.6.40 Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 17:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] Was: ptrace_resume->wake_up_process Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: ptrace_resume() shouldn't wake up !TASK_TRACED thread Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-23 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] signal: sys_pause() should check signal_pending() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110523172352.GA30226@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).