From: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@freebox.fr>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TTY: export NR_LDISC and N_* line discipline numbers to user-space
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:17:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105241517.23166.ffainelli@freebox.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110524124044.GD31517@suse.de>
Hello,
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 14:40:44 Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:43:03AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > From: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@freebox.fr>
> >
> > Since commit (4564f9e5: consolidate line discipline number definitions)
> > the patch moved all line discipline number from a per-architecture
> > termios.h to a shared one: tty.h. However, prior to this consolidation
> > work, the line discipline numbers were outside of an ifdef
> > __KERNEL__/endif block so these numbers used to be exported to
> > user-space.
> >
> > Since such numbers are kernel ABI anyway, and tty.h is already included
> > for user- space header processing, just move these relevant defines
> > outside of the ifdef __KERNEL__/endif block in include/linux/tty.h.
>
> Any reason you didn't copy _any_ of the people who signed off on that
> patch, or the original author of that patch?
No particular reason but my mistake, fixed that.
>
> Anyway, this is been this way for four years, since the 2.6.21 kernel
> release. Since no one has noticed, or complained, since then, how much
> a problem is this really?
This is a problem because you may have out of tree drivers using a line
discpline number, and you do not want your companion user-space application to
have to use a different line discpline number but the one the kernel should
provide.
>
> Meaning, why has it taken this long for anyone to notice?
- long standing user-space applications such as pppd got their N_PPP long ago,
and do not have to worry about N_PPP being renumbered so they can just define
it in pppd's sources it won't break
- I started implementing a line discipline driver only a couple of months ago
and then realized that such ABI should have been exported
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 8:43 [PATCH] TTY: export NR_LDISC and N_* line discipline numbers to user-space Florian Fainelli
2011-05-24 12:40 ` Greg KH
2011-05-24 13:17 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2011-05-24 13:33 ` Greg KH
2011-05-24 13:45 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-05-24 14:09 ` Tilman Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105241517.23166.ffainelli@freebox.fr \
--to=ffainelli@freebox.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=tilman@imap.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox