From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:06:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525070604.GE429@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306278210-18285-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
> /* Index into per_cpu list: */
> u16 cpu_index;
> #endif
> + /* CPU update signature */
> + u32 x86_cpu_update;
Btw,. there's one subtle thing here: it's possible to have *different*
microcode versions on different CPUs in te system.
This can happen if for example the BIOS somehow does not apply the right
microcode to all CPUs. It can also happen if physically different microcode
version CPUs are mixed. In theory people can mix steppings as well.
Would you be interested in adding a quick debugging check after all CPUs have
been brought online, and print some very visible boot warning message if
there's a mismatch between the steppings or microcode versions? Perhaps also
taint the kernel.
Having non-updated microcode is one thing, but having *mixed* versions can
introduce its own set of problems: there are workarounds that have to be
activated on all CPUs, otherwise the result may be undefined.
We did not check for this before, so this would be a separate patch as well.
This should be done in a generic way, so it should work with other x86 CPUs as
well.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 23:03 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision Andi Kleen
2011-05-24 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 23:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data Andi Kleen
2011-05-24 23:58 ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-25 0:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision Fenghua Yu
[not found] ` <BANLkTikoa494-bRWtbbXuE6eqLuH0ZPUTg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C04011E214EC2@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
2011-05-25 0:47 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 8:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-25 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 10:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-25 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 21:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-25 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 16:54 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 19:13 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 7:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-25 16:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-05-25 16:58 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 18:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 19:04 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-05-25 19:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 19:05 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29 10:21 ` Jan Ceuleers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110525070604.GE429@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox