public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "slub: Remove node check in slab_free"
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:58:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525085816.GA24233@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110525074040.GA9233@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> 
> > I started experiencing a boot hang in 2.6.39+, and bisected it to this 
> > change:
> 
> i too was seeing various instabilities and SLUB corruption in -tip testing. 
> Every 5th randconfig kernel crashes.
> 
> I started testing the revert.

Stability of -tip has increased dramatically (36 test iterations and 
no crash), so yes this revert resolves the crashes.

I've attached the changelogified revert patch below. James, since i 
was seeing these sporadically you've saved me a couple of hours of 
rather painful bisection work! :-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

----------------->
>From 6ac0730862b6dd1b45bc86e8e61e4026293b09f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:37:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "slub: Remove node check in slab_free"

This reverts commit 442b06bcea23a01934d3da7ec5898fa154a6cafb.

As Linus explained it's broken. Quoting Linus:

That whole "deactivate_slab()" + "c->page = NULL" that this patch 
does looks bogus.

Look at __slab_alloc(), we have:

        page = c->page;
        if (!page)
                goto new_slab;

        slab_lock(page);
        if (unlikely(!node_match(c, node)))
                goto another_slab;

and let's assume we have two users racing on that "c->page". The 
"slab_lock()" is going to work for one of them, right?

Ok, so the one it works for will then hit:

        if (kmem_cache_debug(s))
                goto debug;

and thus get to the new "deactivate_slab(s,c) + c->page = NULL" and 
then unlock the page.

In the meantime, the one that wasn't able to lock the page will now 
go forward, but will not have "node_match()" any more, so it does 
that "goto another_slab".

Which does "deactivate_slab(s,c)" again, and now c->page is NULL, so 
that totally breaks.

Reported-and-bisected-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Analyzed-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.00.1105242146240.12134@tundra.namei.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 mm/slub.c |    4 +---
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 4ea7f1a..ed1281b 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1881,8 +1881,6 @@ debug:
 
 	page->inuse++;
 	page->freelist = get_freepointer(s, object);
-	deactivate_slab(s, c);
-	c->page = NULL;
 	c->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 	goto unlock_out;
 }
@@ -2114,7 +2112,7 @@ redo:
 	tid = c->tid;
 	barrier();
 
-	if (likely(page == c->page)) {
+	if (likely(page == c->page && c->node != NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
 		set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
 
 		if (unlikely(!irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_double(

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-25  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 11:52 SLUB regression in current Linus James Morris
2011-05-24 12:04 ` James Morris
2011-05-24 14:08   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-24 22:15     ` James Morris
2011-05-25 14:47       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-25 14:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 15:04           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-25 15:45             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-25 16:31               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-25 15:42         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-25 16:29           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-24 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25  5:22   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-25 14:25   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-25  7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25  8:58   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-25 11:13     ` [PATCH] Revert "slub: Remove node check in slab_free" Pekka Enberg
2011-05-25 14:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 12:42   ` SLUB regression in current Linus Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 23:53     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110525085816.GA24233@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox