From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jrbarnette@chromium.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] dm: pass up non-rotational flag
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:35:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110526183531.GB26219@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306356648-30730-1-git-send-email-msb@chromium.org>
Allow QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT to propagate up the device stack if all
underlying devices are non-rotational. Tools like ureadahead will
schedule IOs differently based on the rotational flag.
With this patch, I see boot time go from 7.75 s to 7.46 s on my device.
Suggested-by: J. Richard Barnette <jrbarnette@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
---
drivers/md/dm-table.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
v2: last minute edit was to avoid double-negative in
dm_table_set_restrictions's dm_table_is_nonrot conditional
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
index cb8380c..a173828 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
@@ -1177,6 +1177,31 @@ static void dm_table_set_integrity(struct dm_table *t)
blk_get_integrity(template_disk));
}
+static int device_is_nonrot(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
+ sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
+{
+ struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(dev->bdev);
+
+ return q && blk_queue_nonrot(q);
+}
+
+static bool dm_table_is_nonrot(struct dm_table *t)
+{
+ struct dm_target *ti;
+ unsigned i = 0;
+
+ /* Ensure that all underlying device are non-rotational. */
+ while (i < dm_table_get_num_targets(t)) {
+ ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i++);
+
+ if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
+ !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_nonrot, NULL))
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
struct queue_limits *limits)
{
@@ -1190,6 +1215,11 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
else
queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
+ if (dm_table_is_nonrot(t))
+ queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
+ else
+ queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
+
dm_table_set_integrity(t);
/*
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 20:50 [PATCH] dm: pass up rotational flag Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-05-26 18:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-26 18:29 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-26 18:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-26 18:48 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-26 19:14 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 2:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Introduce blk_set_stacking_limits function Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 13:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Move non-rotational flag to queue limits Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 13:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 2:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-31 12:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 13:14 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-31 14:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-31 14:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Move discard and secure discard flags " Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 13:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 2:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-07-13 15:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-27 16:20 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-05-26 18:35 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110526183531.GB26219@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=jrbarnette@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox