From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: jaxboe@fusionio.com, msb@chromium.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Introduce blk_set_stacking_limits function
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:03:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110527130348.GB17219@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306464169-4291-2-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com>
On Thu, May 26 2011 at 10:42pm -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
> Stacking driver queue limits are typically bounded exclusively by the
> capabilities of the low level devices, not by the stacking driver
> itself.
>
> Stacking drivers are typically permissive. A feature is supported unless
> an incompatible bottom device causes it to be disabled. Low-level
> drivers on the other hand are restrictive and want features disabled by
> default. Low-level drivers explicitly enable features as part of their
> device discovery process.
>
> This patch introduces blk_set_stacking_limits() which has more liberal
> metrics than the default queue limits function. This allows us to
> inherit topology parameters from bottom devices without manually
> tweaking the default limits in each driver prior to calling the stacking
> function.
>
> Since there is now a clear distinction between stacking and low-level
> devices, blk_set_default_limits() has been modified to carry the more
> conservative values that we used to manually set in
> blk_queue_make_request().
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-27 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 20:50 [PATCH] dm: pass up rotational flag Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-05-26 18:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-26 18:29 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-26 18:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-26 18:48 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-26 19:14 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 2:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Introduce blk_set_stacking_limits function Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 13:03 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Move non-rotational flag to queue limits Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 13:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 2:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-31 12:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 13:14 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-31 14:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-31 14:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Move discard and secure discard flags " Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-27 13:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 2:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-07-13 15:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-27 16:20 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-05-26 18:35 ` [PATCH v2] dm: pass up non-rotational flag Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110527130348.GB17219@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox