public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:27:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110527202747.GA4803@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE006C5.4010906@fusionio.com>

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Agree on Christophs comments, we should not pretend they are the same
> (since they are not). Since flush is a request on its own, F works
> nicely. For FUA it's associated with a write, so F should work there too
> indicating Write Fua (and easily humanly parsed as that, or Write
> Flush). WU would look confusing.

REQ_FLUSH can also be set on a write bio, it only gets split at the
request level.  And even there we're at least pondering allowing it
to stay as part of the write for some paravirtualized storage protocols.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-27 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-27 13:11 [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier Namhyung Kim
2011-05-27 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: add REQ_SECURE to REQ_COMMON_MASK Namhyung Kim
2011-05-27 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-27 13:57   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-27 15:13     ` Namhyung Kim
2011-05-27 20:17       ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:27         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-05-28  2:09           ` Namhyung Kim
2011-05-28  7:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-31 10:27               ` Namhyung Kim
2011-05-31 10:37             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110527202747.GA4803@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox