public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	indan@nul.nu
Subject: Re: execve-under-ptrace API bug (was Re: Ptrace documentation, draft #3)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:56:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530135623.GC4739@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110530084906.GA11773@htj.dyndns.org>

On 05/30, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> A problem is that by the time de-threading is in progress, it's
> already too deep and there's no way back and the exec'ing thread has
> to wait for completion in uninterruptible sleeps - ie. it expects
> de-threading to finish in finite amount of time and to achieve that it
> basically sends SIGKILL to all other threads.  If we introduce a trap
> in de-threading itself, we can easily end up with an unkillable
> task.

"unkillable" is not the problem, afaics. But the new trap is problematic,
we do not want the TASK_TRACED task holding the mutexes taken by the
callers of de_thread.

> 1. Don't allow more than one thread in the same group enter exec(2)
>    path at all.

This is already done, see do_execve()->prepare_bprm_creds().
cred_guard_mutex serializes exec. Btw, probably this allows us to do
more cleanups/simplifications in do_execve() paths.

> 2. Add another trap point right before de-threading commences.

See above.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-30 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 19:23 Ptrace documentation, draft #3 Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-25 14:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-30  3:08   ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30  3:28   ` execve-under-ptrace API bug (was Re: Ptrace documentation, draft #3) Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30  8:49     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-30 11:40       ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 14:27         ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 16:42           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-30 23:43             ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-31 13:51               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-02 10:57                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-02 14:59                   ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-06-02 15:12                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 18:11           ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-30 13:56       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-30 13:49     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-30 13:35 ` Ptrace documentation, draft #3 Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110530135623.GC4739@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox